2019
DOI: 10.1096/fj.201802488r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural disease history of the D2‐mdx mouse model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Abstract: The C57BL/10ScSn‐Dmdmdx/J (BL10‐mdx) mouse has been the most commonly used model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) for decades. Their muscle dysfunction and pathology is, however, less severe than in patients with DMD, which complicates preclinical studies. Recent discoveries indicate that disease severity is exacerbated when muscular dystrophy mouse models are generated on a DBA2/J genetic background. Knowledge on the natural history of animal models is pivotal for high‐quality preclinical testing. Howeve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
97
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
11
97
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Skeletal muscle pathology of the gamma-sarcoglycan (Sgcg)-null mouse model (Box 1) of limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) is worse in a DBA2/J than a 129/SVemst/J genetic background (Fukada et al, 2010;Heydemann et al, 2009). Likewise, the DBA2/J background is associated with a worse mdx pathology than the C57Bl/10 background (Fukada et al, 2010;Coley et al, 2016;van Putten et al, 2019) (Box 1). Furthermore, genetic modifiers (Box 1) in DMD and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy affect membrane-associated proteins that may preserve muscle fibres against degeneration (reviewed in Hightower and Alexander, 2018).…”
Section: Satellite Cell Defects In Muscular Dystrophiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skeletal muscle pathology of the gamma-sarcoglycan (Sgcg)-null mouse model (Box 1) of limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) is worse in a DBA2/J than a 129/SVemst/J genetic background (Fukada et al, 2010;Heydemann et al, 2009). Likewise, the DBA2/J background is associated with a worse mdx pathology than the C57Bl/10 background (Fukada et al, 2010;Coley et al, 2016;van Putten et al, 2019) (Box 1). Furthermore, genetic modifiers (Box 1) in DMD and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy affect membrane-associated proteins that may preserve muscle fibres against degeneration (reviewed in Hightower and Alexander, 2018).…”
Section: Satellite Cell Defects In Muscular Dystrophiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of readouts and biomarkers needs to be tailored to the drug tested and to the expected efficacy, both on the molecular level and for functional, clinically relevant aspects. Notably, as in human trials, preclinical studies can only be properly planned when the natural history of the model system is known (see for example Gordish-Dressman et al, 2018;van Putten et al, 2019;Verhaart et al, 2019), as this will also guide researchers in determining when to start the intervention and when and how to assess its therapeutic effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D2mdx mice have lower counts of centralized nuclei and active regeneration (BrdU and eMHC staining). A striking difference between the strains is extensive calcified muscles in D2mdx mice [23] . These seem to be directly linked to muscle damage, differ in abundance between muscles and these calcifications ameliorate with age (very abundant in 10 week old mice, but much reduced numbers at 34 weeks of age).…”
Section: Pathological Pathways In Dystrophic Models Of Dmd and Lgmd: mentioning
confidence: 96%