2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural disasters' impact, factors of resilience and development: A meta-analysis of the macroeconomic literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
79
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, what may look like a catastrophe at the local level does not necessarily matter at aggregate levels, unless the geographical size of the country is itself very small, such as Haiti, for instance (Cavallo et al 2010). Therefore, while negative effects are found on specific samples or disaster types (e.g., Hsiang and Jina (2014) for cyclones), no significant impact emerge in meta-analyses of indirect costs (Lazzaroni and van Bergeijk 2014). 2 Skidmore and Toya (2002) even argue that natural disasters may even have a positive long run growth effect via the reconstruction activities in the recovery phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Yet, what may look like a catastrophe at the local level does not necessarily matter at aggregate levels, unless the geographical size of the country is itself very small, such as Haiti, for instance (Cavallo et al 2010). Therefore, while negative effects are found on specific samples or disaster types (e.g., Hsiang and Jina (2014) for cyclones), no significant impact emerge in meta-analyses of indirect costs (Lazzaroni and van Bergeijk 2014). 2 Skidmore and Toya (2002) even argue that natural disasters may even have a positive long run growth effect via the reconstruction activities in the recovery phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As already mentioned in the introduction, general equilibrium models, which are widely employed to assess the economic impacts of disasters (Kousky, 2014;Lazzaroni and van Bergeijk, 2014), assume a global equilibrium in each timestep, i. e., they adjust prices to obtain immediate market clearance. In the direct disaster aftermath, these immediately adjusted prices should not be interpreted as real observable prices, but should rather be understood as scarcity indicators (Hallegatte, 2014).…”
Section: Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to estimate the indirect losses to assess the consequences of natural disasters on welfare, as has for example been emphasized by Hallegatte and Przyluski (2010). However, the evidence for the disaster impacts on economic growth are inconclusive and are mostly obtained from highly aggregated macroeconomic data at the country or regional levels (Klomp & Valckx, 2014;Lazzaroni & van Bergeijk, 2014). This inconsistency in results is in part related to the failure in fully accounting for the differences in disaster types, locations, economic and financial development, institutional quality, time period used for the analysis, disaster cost definitions, and assessment methodologies (Loayza, Olaberría, Rigolini, & Christiaensen, 2012;Cavallo, Galiani, Noy, & Pantano, 2013;Felbermayr & Gröschl, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disaster impacts can be divided in direct impacts, like property losses, and indirect economic impacts, such as effects on economic growth. The former are relatively well understood, while insights into economic growth impacts of natural disasters are more uncertain (Lazzaroni & van Bergeijk, 2014). It is important to estimate the indirect losses to assess the consequences of natural disasters on welfare, as has for example been emphasized by Hallegatte and Przyluski (2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%