2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11036-013-0456-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Disaster Monitoring with Wireless Sensor Networks: A Case Study of Data-intensive Applications upon Low-Cost Scalable Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) Delay of data aggregation: this challenge is crucial in many WSN applications [24], particularly when dealing with critical data that should be received without any delay. Examples of these data are heart pulses and electrocardiograms of patients [25], disaster detection alarms [26] and power supply requests in smart grids [27]. (5) Interference and fading: wireless devices mostly operate on license-free bands such as 2.4 GHz ISM band [28].…”
Section: Wireless Sensor Network Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(4) Delay of data aggregation: this challenge is crucial in many WSN applications [24], particularly when dealing with critical data that should be received without any delay. Examples of these data are heart pulses and electrocardiograms of patients [25], disaster detection alarms [26] and power supply requests in smart grids [27]. (5) Interference and fading: wireless devices mostly operate on license-free bands such as 2.4 GHz ISM band [28].…”
Section: Wireless Sensor Network Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of these data are heart pulses and electrocardiograms of patients [25], disaster detection alarms [26] and power supply requests in smart grids [27]. (5) Interference and fading: wireless devices mostly operate on license-free bands such as 2.4 GHz ISM band [28].…”
Section: Network Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) Case III: Congestion Control and Prediction (Section 4.3). Similar to the second case, but with an additional weight (AW), here, we defined link score (LS) as a path selection criterion over EW and AW, as shown in (8). Here, is a weighted constant for determining a relationship between these two factors, which ranges between 0 and 1:…”
Section: Path Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the energy consumed by communication should be minimized. In other words, the management of mobile nodes or dynamic routing based on redundant paths must ensure event transmission with low network maintenance costs [97] . Towards this approach, Miyazaki et al [26] proposed a WSN, denoted as diehard sensor network that provides continuous monitoring without any maintenance even if some sensor nodes fail.…”
Section: Wireless Sensor Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%