2022
DOI: 10.2514/1.t6466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Convection Inside a Porous Square Enclosure Embedded with Two Elliptic Cylinders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mesh independency tests were run with different mesh densities, that is crucial for natural convection simulations. 62,63 Figure 4 compares the temperature distribution along the heat exchanger obtained using mesh densities of 72.2 × 10 and 3 285.7 × 10 3 rectangular grid points (cell-size decrease of four times). These simulations were run at a flow rate of 1.1 L/s and 40°C inlet temperature and 1-h elapsed time.…”
Section: Mesh Independence and Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mesh independency tests were run with different mesh densities, that is crucial for natural convection simulations. 62,63 Figure 4 compares the temperature distribution along the heat exchanger obtained using mesh densities of 72.2 × 10 and 3 285.7 × 10 3 rectangular grid points (cell-size decrease of four times). These simulations were run at a flow rate of 1.1 L/s and 40°C inlet temperature and 1-h elapsed time.…”
Section: Mesh Independence and Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesh independency tests were run with different mesh densities, that is crucial for natural convection simulations 62,63 . Figure 4 compares the temperature distribution along the heat exchanger obtained using mesh densities of 72.2×103 and $72.2\times {10}^{3}\unicode{x02007}\text{and}$ 285.7×103 $285.7\times {10}^{3}$ rectangular grid points (cell‐size decrease of four times).…”
Section: Model Validation and Mesh Independencementioning
confidence: 99%