1994
DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(94)90176-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural convection in a hemispherical enclosure heated from below

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The natural convective heat transfer coefficient is then calculated by means of correlations of the Nusselt–Rayleigh type. The same applies to the hemispherical enclosure considered by Shiina et al (1994) containing a fluid with a Prandtl number ranging between 6 and 13,000. Some applications are treated by Baïri (2014a) and Baïri et al (2015) using air as convective fluid and considering various thermal boundary conditions compatible with the intended applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The natural convective heat transfer coefficient is then calculated by means of correlations of the Nusselt–Rayleigh type. The same applies to the hemispherical enclosure considered by Shiina et al (1994) containing a fluid with a Prandtl number ranging between 6 and 13,000. Some applications are treated by Baïri (2014a) and Baïri et al (2015) using air as convective fluid and considering various thermal boundary conditions compatible with the intended applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are relatively high, varying between 3.55 × 10 9 and 5.60 × 10 11 for horizontal and vertical cavities, respectively. The value 3.55 × 10 9 corresponding to α ¼ 0°i s greater than that given by Shiina et al (1994), equal to 1 × 10 9 . However, it Figure 4.…”
Section: (A) Exponent N(α)mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Nu-Ra correlations should be noted that the thermal boundary conditions treated in both studies are different since in the work by Shiina et al (1994), a constant temperature is imposed on the base of the hemisphere and hence the Rayleigh number is calculated differently. In addition, the thermophysical properties of the air are not evaluated at the same temperature, which causes a difference in the resulting Rayleigh number.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical procedure was validated using the experimental work reported by Yasuaki et al [43] as shown in table 2. The enclosed hemisphere was experimentally studied under steady state, laminar conditions.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%