2007
DOI: 10.1080/00986440701569127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Convection Flow of Second-Grade Fluid Along a Vertical Heated Surface With Power-Law Temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(20) and (21) together with the boundary conditions given by Eqs. (22) and (23). These equations are solved numerically employing the local non-similarity method as well as implicit finite difference method for values of n in [0, 10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(20) and (21) together with the boundary conditions given by Eqs. (22) and (23). These equations are solved numerically employing the local non-similarity method as well as implicit finite difference method for values of n in [0, 10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since natural convection in viscoelastic fluids has also been investigated because of the applications these materials have in industry and geophysics, very recently, the natural convection flow of a second-grade viscoelastic fluid along a heated, vertical surface has been investigated numerically by Mustafa et al [23]. In this analysis, the local non-similarity method as well as the implicit finite difference method have been employed in finding the values of the physical quantities, such as, the local skin-friction and local heat transfer against the local Deborah number for large Prandtl number fluids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the accuracy of the present computational results are compared with the erstwhile studies (Newtonian fluid) of Lee et al for Pr = 0.7, β0.05em=0.25em0,normal italicγ0.05em=0.25em0, and ε=0, and it is found to be in good agreement, which is shown in Figure . Further, to validate the Crank‐Nicolson method for the present study on the non‐Newtonian second‐grade fluid model, the authors considered different physical model on second‐grade fluid and implemented the same Crank‐Nicolson method to get the numerical results for their study. These results are in good agreement with Mustafa et al and shown in Figure .…”
Section: Finite Difference Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, to validate the Crank‐Nicolson method for the present study on the non‐Newtonian second‐grade fluid model, the authors considered different physical model on second‐grade fluid and implemented the same Crank‐Nicolson method to get the numerical results for their study. These results are in good agreement with Mustafa et al and shown in Figure . Therefore, it is concluded that confidence in the present Crank‐Nicolson code is justifiably high and that the present numerical results demonstrate sufficiently high accuracy.…”
Section: Finite Difference Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is not possible to neglect the effect of buoyancy forces for vertical or inclined surfaces. Mustafa et al (2008) investigated numerically the natural convection flow of a second-grade viscoelastic fluid along a heated, vertical surface with power law surface temperature by the implicit finite difference method and observed that the skin friction and surface heat transfer rate increases with increasing value of the temperature gradient for a given value of local Deborah number, while both the local skin friction and local heat transfer rate decrease with increasing Deborah number for a given value of the surface temperature gradient and for a given Prandtl number. Further Mustafa et al (2010) studied the same problem taking the effect of variable heat flux in place of power law surface temperature and obtained that both the local skin-friction and the local Nusselt number decrease with increase in Deborah number whereas, increase in Deborah number reduces the velocity and enhances the temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%