2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.04.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural carbon stable isotope ratios as indicators of the relative contribution of live and inert diets to growth in larval Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis)

Abstract: The relative contributions of live Artemia metanauplii and an inert diet for growth of Senegalese sole larvae and postlarvae were assessed through the analysis of carbon stable isotopes ratios (δ 13 C) in both diets and whole larval tissue. Larvae were reared on four dietary regimes: 100% live prey (rotifers and Artemia), 100% inert formulated diet and two co-feeding regimes of 70:30 and 30:70 ratios of Artemia and inert diet, respectively. Larvae from the live food regime and both co-feeding regimes showed a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(42 reference statements)
2
71
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Carbon contents in Artemia nauplii and inert diets were similar; therefore, no corrections were applied to estimate carbon contributions from the two sources (Fry, 2006;Gamboa-Delgado et al, 2008). Results from the isotope mixing model indicate that observed carbon contributions from Artemia nauplii were significantly higher (P<0.001) than expected contributions indicated by the carbon proportions established in the three co-feeding regimes (Tables 1 and 4), while nutritional contributions from the inert diet were lower than expected.…”
Section: Relative Contribution Of Artemia and Inert Diet To Larval Anmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Carbon contents in Artemia nauplii and inert diets were similar; therefore, no corrections were applied to estimate carbon contributions from the two sources (Fry, 2006;Gamboa-Delgado et al, 2008). Results from the isotope mixing model indicate that observed carbon contributions from Artemia nauplii were significantly higher (P<0.001) than expected contributions indicated by the carbon proportions established in the three co-feeding regimes (Tables 1 and 4), while nutritional contributions from the inert diet were lower than expected.…”
Section: Relative Contribution Of Artemia and Inert Diet To Larval Anmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Pre-analysis sample preparation and analytical methods for determination of carbon and nitrogen contents, carbon isotopic ratios (δ 13 C) and procedures to estimate proportional nutrient contribution from inert diets and Artemia using a two-source, one-isotope mixing model (Phillips and Gregg, 2001) are described in Gamboa-Delgado et al (2008). Carbon isotope discrimination factors (∆ 13 C) were estimated as the difference between δ 13 C mean values of shrimps and the δ 13 C of their respective diets after reaching isotopic equilibrium.…”
Section: Stable Isotope Analysis and Estimation Of Nutrient Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most studies of isotopic incorporation in fishes have been performed with juvenile animals that grow a) Pterygoplichthys disjunctivus Table 3) were used to analyze the isotopic signatures of the animals in plot b. CBOM=coarse benthic organic matter at a rapid pace (Hesslein et al 1993;Suzuki et al 2005;Trueman et al 2005;Vollaire et al 2007;Zuanon et al 2007;Gamboa-Delgado et al 2008). Thus, in these studies, rates of isotopic incorporation were similar to growth rate and, therefore, mostly reflective of new tissue accretion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, studies that take advantage of the natural isotopic composition of dietary components may be designed to investigate integrated measures of ingestion, assimilation and growth over longer time periods under normal feeding and environmental conditions. To date, relatively few studies have adopted this approach, which is particularly useful in determining the sources and fate of nutrients (Schlechtriem et al, 2004;Jomori et al, 2005;Gamboa-Delgado et al, 2008) and in assessing tissue carbon and nitrogen turnover rates (Hesslein et al, 1993;Herzka et al, 2001;Gamboa-Delgado et al, 2008;Gamboa-Delgado and Le Vay, 2009b). Unlike the very high levels of heavy isotopes present in enriched feeds, natural abundance of carbon and nitrogen isotopes is very strongly biased toward the lighter 12 C and 14 N isotopes, and the differences in isotopic signature between dietary components is small.…”
Section: Natural Stable Isotopes Versus Enriched Stable Isotope Tracersmentioning
confidence: 99%