2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01579.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural and within-farmland biodiversity enhances crop productivity

Abstract: Running title -Weeds maximize nature benefits to crops AbstractOngoing expansion of large-scale agriculture critically threatens natural habitats and the pollination services they offer. Creating patches with high plant diversity within farmland is commonly suggested as a measure to benefit pollinators. However, farmers rarely adopt such practice, instead removing naturally occurring plants (weeds). By combining pollinator exclusion experiments with analysis of honeybee behaviour and flower-visitation webs, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
218
4
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(244 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
13
218
4
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Flower abundance is often an important predictor of indirect interactions, as a greater number of flowers equates to a greater chance of being encountered, patches containing many flowers can be more easily detected (Schiestl and Johnson, 2013), and pollinators tend to visit more inflorescences in larger patches of flowers (Goulson, 2000). That the strength of indirect effects increased with flower abundance at a greater rate for weeds and exotic plant species flowering in mango fields than for species growing in natural vegetation highlights the value of weeds in supporting flower visitors, an observation that has been noted elsewhere (Carvalheiro et al, 2011;Nel et al, 2017). This may be because (a) flowering plants in natural vegetation are more dispersed; (b) weeds flowered consistently and abundantly; and (c) weeds are in close proximity to the mango flowers, so energy expenditure to reach these flowers is minimised.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Potential Indirect Effects Between Mango Amentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Flower abundance is often an important predictor of indirect interactions, as a greater number of flowers equates to a greater chance of being encountered, patches containing many flowers can be more easily detected (Schiestl and Johnson, 2013), and pollinators tend to visit more inflorescences in larger patches of flowers (Goulson, 2000). That the strength of indirect effects increased with flower abundance at a greater rate for weeds and exotic plant species flowering in mango fields than for species growing in natural vegetation highlights the value of weeds in supporting flower visitors, an observation that has been noted elsewhere (Carvalheiro et al, 2011;Nel et al, 2017). This may be because (a) flowering plants in natural vegetation are more dispersed; (b) weeds flowered consistently and abundantly; and (c) weeds are in close proximity to the mango flowers, so energy expenditure to reach these flowers is minimised.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Potential Indirect Effects Between Mango Amentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Indeed, genetic diversity of the honeybee population is reduced in agricultural vs. natural areas (Jaffé et al 2010). Even in agriculturally utilised land, pollination success is dependent on pollinator diversity (Carvalheiro et al 2011). Moreover, honeybees actively regulate their nutritional intake (Altaye et al 2010;Pirk et al 2010).…”
Section: Floral Resources and Habitat Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weeds are often considered impediments to agricultural production due to their impacts on crop yields and interference with farming practices [5]. However, many weed species can also provide valuable ecosystem services including increasing soil organic matter, facilitating nutrient cycling, serving as propagule pools of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and symbiotic bacteria such as Rhizobia [6], and providing food and habitat for pollinators [7] and natural enemies [8,9]. Ground beetles are one of the most widespread, abundant, and diverse groups of insects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%