2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural and hybrid immunity following four COVID-19 waves: A prospective cohort study of mothers in South Africa

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(64 reference statements)
8
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These trials had found similar effect sizes of around five-fold reduction in risk of Alpha infections at anti-S antibody levels of 600 IU/mL (Feng et al, 2021), and a halving of hazard by 10-fold increase in anti-S titers for ancestral strain infections (Gilbert et al, 2022). Moreover our results are in line with available studies on Omicron BA.1/BA.2 subvariants which have also found binding antibody levels to be correlates of protection against infection using in-house immunoassays (Hertz et al, 2022;Zar et al, 2022). On the other hand, we did not find differences in the hazard of having an Omicron BA.1/BA.2 infection with anti-S antibody levels below or above a certain threshold in the non-infected vaccinated group, as opposed to results reported for Delta infections (Wei et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These trials had found similar effect sizes of around five-fold reduction in risk of Alpha infections at anti-S antibody levels of 600 IU/mL (Feng et al, 2021), and a halving of hazard by 10-fold increase in anti-S titers for ancestral strain infections (Gilbert et al, 2022). Moreover our results are in line with available studies on Omicron BA.1/BA.2 subvariants which have also found binding antibody levels to be correlates of protection against infection using in-house immunoassays (Hertz et al, 2022;Zar et al, 2022). On the other hand, we did not find differences in the hazard of having an Omicron BA.1/BA.2 infection with anti-S antibody levels below or above a certain threshold in the non-infected vaccinated group, as opposed to results reported for Delta infections (Wei et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Using the same immunoassay as in this study and a cell-free Spike trimer-ACE2 binding-based surrogate neutralization assay (Fenwick et al, 2021), we did not observe any significant correlation between anti-S binding and neutralizing antibody levels against Omicron subvariants in uninfected participants, as opposed to previously infected participants (Zaballa et al, 2022). These results can be linked to growing evidence that hybrid immunity (infection plus vaccination) provides the strongest protection against Omicron subvariant infections (Altarawneh et al 2022, Zar et al 2022, Golddblatt 2022. This infection history-specificity thus warrants care in the interpretation of binding antibodies as correlates of protection against Omicron sub-lineages, and could be immunoassay-dependent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For now, current evidence supports strong protection against severe COVID-19 from prior infection, 34,35 which is even better with hybrid immunity (prior infection plus vaccination). 36,37 The SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was generally high across all the seven districts surveyed in the current study, with higher seroprevalence in urban compared to rural areas, as reported in our blood donor serosurvey 10 and in other sub-Saharan African settings. 38 This is consistent with national COVID-19 data at the time of the study that reported 51% of confirmed cases in the country were from the cities of Blantyre and Lilongwe, 17 with a caveat that rural areas had relatively fewer SARS-CoV-2 testing sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%