2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-13425-3_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural and Anthropogenic Determinants of Freshwater Ecosystem Deterioration: An Environmental Forensic Study of the Langat River Basin, Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Po-210 status in raw ( t = 3.22, p = 0.015) and treated water ( t = 2.924, p = 0.022) was significantly safe at 95% confidence level (i.e., t statistic) through drinking water, however, the overall efficiency of all the WTPs in the basin was about 59% which might be due to an inability to remove Po-210 from treated water by the conventional method used at the plants as well as the small number of water samples. The Serai and Langat WTPs have the higher Po-210 removal efficiencies from treated water, about 93% and 81%, respectively, might be because of lower iron concentration (175 µg/L) in the upstream region of the Langat River than the downstream (264 µg/L) [ 46 ] along with higher manganese and total dissolved solids at the downstream [ 47 , 48 ], although all the WTPs in the basin follow a conventional coagulation method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Po-210 status in raw ( t = 3.22, p = 0.015) and treated water ( t = 2.924, p = 0.022) was significantly safe at 95% confidence level (i.e., t statistic) through drinking water, however, the overall efficiency of all the WTPs in the basin was about 59% which might be due to an inability to remove Po-210 from treated water by the conventional method used at the plants as well as the small number of water samples. The Serai and Langat WTPs have the higher Po-210 removal efficiencies from treated water, about 93% and 81%, respectively, might be because of lower iron concentration (175 µg/L) in the upstream region of the Langat River than the downstream (264 µg/L) [ 46 ] along with higher manganese and total dissolved solids at the downstream [ 47 , 48 ], although all the WTPs in the basin follow a conventional coagulation method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Wang et al [14] found high dissolved Cd concentration (61.74 × 10 −2 ± 90.12 × 10 −2 mg/L) in the Huaihe River, China. Aris et al [9] reported a low Cr concentration (6.7 × 10 −4 ± 9 × 10 −4 mg/L) in the Langat River; however, higher Cr concentration was recorded (7 × 10 −2 mg/L) water) at Langat River Basin, Malaysia. Three replicates of water samples were collected from the eight points of Langat River where the WTPs collect water for drinking water treatment purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, these metals have been listed as the toxic trace metals by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) if ingested via drinking water. The natural weathering of mineral rocks is considered as the main source of Cd and Cr in the Langat River, Malaysia [9,10]. Low concentration of dissolved Cd (1 × 10 −3 mg/L) was reported by Mamun et al [11] in the Langat River; however, Sarmani [12] and Yusuf [13] observed very high concentration of Cd in Langat River (35.56 × 10 −3 mg/L and 24 × 10 −3 mg/L, respectively).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the natural weathering process, the use of fertilizers such as arsenal herbicides (i.e. lead arsenate) in the agricultural activities [20] mainly in palm oil plantation [21] as well as tin mining [5,22] are the important sources of Pb in the Langat River. Furthermore, the man-made activities such as electroplating, automobile exhaust, mining, etc.…”
Section: Dissolved Pb Concentration In Raw Watermentioning
confidence: 99%