2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural ambiguities: Racial categorization of multiracial individuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
188
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
17
188
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, even to say that race should be conceived of as a continuum is an inadequate corrective to categorical thinking; rather, race is a space defined by a large number of orthogonal continua within which we have contingently imposed a system of discrete categories. Of course, categories have psychological power: Once we are accustomed to them, discrete race categories appear obvious or even natural, and thus, multiracial people can become difficult or ambiguous perceptual objects, at least to monoracial perceivers (Chen & Hamilton, 2012).…”
Section: Race As Continua Versus Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, even to say that race should be conceived of as a continuum is an inadequate corrective to categorical thinking; rather, race is a space defined by a large number of orthogonal continua within which we have contingently imposed a system of discrete categories. Of course, categories have psychological power: Once we are accustomed to them, discrete race categories appear obvious or even natural, and thus, multiracial people can become difficult or ambiguous perceptual objects, at least to monoracial perceivers (Chen & Hamilton, 2012).…”
Section: Race As Continua Versus Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, some multiracial individuals choose to self-identify in terms of one specific racial identity, and such self-identifications may affect how others see them. But beyond these anecdotes, there is abundant evidence that when asked to categorize unfamiliar multiracial targets, monoracial perceivers frequently place them into discrete racial categories even when a multiracial category is available (Chen & Hamilton, 2012; despite the fact that many multiracial individuals actually prefer to identify and be seen as multiracial (Townsend, Markus, & Bergsieker, 2009;Udry, Li, & Hendrickson-Smith, 2003).…”
Section: Multiracial Individuals As Targets Of Social Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the pervasive and consensual nature of the existing monoracial categories, we did not expect IMS and EMS to influence categorizations of Black targets or White targets. Monoracial Black and White persons are usually categorized quickly and easily as Black and White, respectively (Chen & Hamilton, 2012;Willadsen-Jensen & Ito, 2006).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, concordant categorizations of multiracial targets mean categorizing them as Multiracial, whereas concordant categorizations of Black targets and White targets mean categorizing them as Black and White, respectively. Discordant categorizations occur when perceivers categorize multiracial targets as monoracial (either Black or White) and when they categorize monoracial Black or White targets as Multiracial (see Chen & Hamilton, 2012, for additional discussion of this terminology).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the influence of outliers on sample means, response latencies below 300 ms and above 3000 ms (1.1% of responses) were replaced with those values, respectively (e.g., Chen & Hamilton, 2012). Another paired samples t-test revealed that response latencies for correct responses were longer for the matched probes (M = 1098, SD = 293) than for the mismatched probes (M = 1011, SD = 288), t(45) = 2.96, p = .01, d = 0.88.…”
Section: Response Latenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%