Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms 2015
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611974331.ch131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Algorithms for Flow Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other details on the physical underpinnings of Physarum's tubular dynamics are discussed by Tero et al [2005]. Finally, the slime mold network dynamics have also been considered from a combinatorial optimization perspective in the discrete algorithms literature [Becchetti et al, 2013, Straszak andVishnoi, 2016].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other details on the physical underpinnings of Physarum's tubular dynamics are discussed by Tero et al [2005]. Finally, the slime mold network dynamics have also been considered from a combinatorial optimization perspective in the discrete algorithms literature [Becchetti et al, 2013, Straszak andVishnoi, 2016].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let Note that the first term is nonnegative whenever x(t) is feasible for the LP, and the second term is always nonnegative. Similar to previous analysis of Physarum dynamics based on potential functions [4,17,18], the potential function Φ contains a term that depends on the cost of the candidate solution x, and an "entropic barrier" term that captures the geometry of the feasible region: in particular, the second term penalizes distributions that get too close to the boundary of the positive orthant whenever the corresponding coordinate of the optimal solution is not on the boundary (that is, ξ j (t) ≈ 0 but ξ * j > 0). A difference with respect to previous papers is that the potential function (7) is dimensionless, which is natural since our aim is to bound the relative, rather than absolute, approximation error.…”
Section: Convergence In Cost Valuementioning
confidence: 69%
“…The convergence proof gives an upper bound on the step size and on the number of steps required until an ε-approximation of the optimum is obtained. [SV16b] extends the result to the transshipment problem and [SV16a] further generalizes the result to the case of positive LPs. The paper [SV16b] is related to our first result.…”
Section: The Biologically-inspired Modelmentioning
confidence: 77%