Natura Urbans, Natura Urbanata: Ecological Urbanism, Circulation, and the Immunization of Nature

Abstract

While 'ecological urbanism' promises the introduction of a new generation of apparatuses, exacting control ever more deeply within the social whole, the logic by which such networks of power operate has remained largely unchanged since the 19th century. This paper will demonstrate the persistence of this logic by placing ecological urbanism within a genealogy of the concept of urbanization. Looking at the work of Spanish civil engineer, Ildfonso Cerda, I will examine his remarkably prescient theory in which he proposed to replace what he saw as the 'anachronistic' ciudad (city) with the 'modern' figure of the urbe-a generic, scaleless template of territorialization engulfed in expansive urbanización. The first part of the paper focuses on Cerdá's concept of vialidad (roughly, 'circulation'), which formed the basis of his theory of urbanization and provided its origin in 'nature' itself. Urbanization was an effort to free mankind from political domination and recover it's 'natural' destiny by unifying a latent global society in a single, interconnected global urbe. However, not only did Cerdá's theory introduce a new, far more pervasive technological relationship of power between government and population; it also set free to circulate what was previously fixed in the space and form of the city: the apparatus. In the second part of the paper I reexamine ecological urbanism with regard to the founding relationship between urbanization and nature. Now, because it is nature that has become pathological to humanity, it is nature which must be immunized. Ecological urbanism thus reinvigorates the capacity of the urban to stave off the end of the world, not only by rhetorically reaffirming the natural origins of urbanization but also by inverting this relationship: ecological urbanism proposes to reconstruct nature as urbanization.

Contesting Eco‐Urbanism from Below: The Construction of ‘Zero‐Waste Neighborhoods’ in Chinese Cities

“…It could refer to a model of urban development (see e.g. This study adopts the definition used by Mathew Gandy and understands eco-urbanism as the ideological and material processes of social change (Gandy, 2015; see also Adams, 2014). Caprotti, 2015;Sharifi, 2016).…”

“…Caprotti, 2015;Sharifi, 2016). This study adopts the definition used by Mathew Gandy and understands eco-urbanism as the ideological and material processes of social change (Gandy, 2015; see also Adams, 2014).…”

“…The narratives go further to suggest that although the territorial form of climate control policy is most clearly expressed at the international level (where countries have set different emission limits following negotiations over the capacity for change and existing economic and social circumstances), it is at the urban and regional levels that international and national carbon-control regimes have become prominent (While et al, 2010). As a result, urbanization and urban regeneration projects are increasingly treated as 'experiments' in which new carbon-control technologies, architectures, urban designs and environmental-economic reforms are put to the test (Hodson and Marvin, 2010;May, 2011;Cugurullo, 2013;Adams, 2014;Bulkeley et al, 2014;Caprotti et al, 2015).…”

From Planning the Port/City to Planning the Port-City: Exploring the Economic Interface in European Port Cities

“…However, the 'regular' Euclidian visualisation gave us an analytical problem (cf. Adams (2014). Some nodes in our network are located on the same location (cf.…”

Controlled environments: An urban research agenda on microclimatic enclosure

“…In response, (more) efficient, precise enclosed urbanisms are produced to bypass perceived socio-ecological constraints of the existing urban climate regime. CE involve the production, maintenance/manipulation and extension/circulation of 'denatured space', that is, this is not a mobilisation of nature, bringing nature into the city in the usual way (some kind of conflation of nature and culture as has been analysed by urban political ecologists over the last 20 years), but more its effacement or 'immunisation' (Adams, 2014). This is, as Luke (1995) argues in the case of Biosphere 2, synthetic nature with an engineering infrastructure.…”