2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natriuretic Peptides as Inclusion Criteria in Clinical Trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, information regarding the diagnostic and prognostic roles of biomarkers such as NT‐proBNP in this clinical context is lacking. Historically, studies such as TOPCAT 14 have supported the value of NT‐proBNP and it has in recent years played a growing role in the standardization of both the definition of HF and the inclusion criteria of major clinical trials 15 . This cardiac biomarker has proven useful for the diagnosis of AHF in patients presenting with dyspnoea and no previous history of HF, especially if other imaging techniques such as transthoracic echocardiography are not readily available 4 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, information regarding the diagnostic and prognostic roles of biomarkers such as NT‐proBNP in this clinical context is lacking. Historically, studies such as TOPCAT 14 have supported the value of NT‐proBNP and it has in recent years played a growing role in the standardization of both the definition of HF and the inclusion criteria of major clinical trials 15 . This cardiac biomarker has proven useful for the diagnosis of AHF in patients presenting with dyspnoea and no previous history of HF, especially if other imaging techniques such as transthoracic echocardiography are not readily available 4 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We limited the number of patients who had an ejection fraction of more than 30% by requiring a history of hospitalization for heart failure within the previous 12 months or a particularly high level of N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), including a level of at least 1000 pg per milliliter in those with an ejection fraction of 31 to 35% or a level of at least 2500 pg per milliliter in those with an ejection fraction of 36 to 40%, as compared with a level of at least 600 pg per milliliter in those with an ejection fraction of 30% or less. 6 These NT-proBNP thresholds were doubled in patients with atrial fibrillation. 5 The key inclusion and exclusion criteria are provided in the Supplementary Appendix, available at NEJM.org.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, without NT-proBNP, the differentiation of acute heart failure from non-cardiac dyspnea might be less accurate. Moreover, the importance of using natriuretic peptides as inclusion criteria in clinical trials was recently proposed [ 63 ]. Thus, including patients without NT-proBNP results in statistical modeling might not be appropriate and may bias the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%