2018
DOI: 10.4038/cjs.v47i2.7508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Native tree species diversity of Rampahar Natural Forest Reserve in Rangamati South Forest Division, Bangladesh

Abstract: Tropical forests of Bangladesh are facing rapid loss in floristic diversity and resultant changes of vegetation necessitates the assessment of plant composition and diversity. The present study was conducted to assess the composition of native tree species of Rampahar Forest Reserve of Rangamati hill district, Bangladesh. Rampahar is a remnant tropical semievergreen natural forest extending to an area of 648 ha. Simple random sampling method with 20 m × 20 m sized 20 and 5 m × 5 m sized 10 samples plots were u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(7 reference statements)
2
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, present study exceeds the findings of Nur et al (2016) where, they found 36% of the tree species (17 out of 47) are regenerating in the study area, while majority of the tree species (64%) are not getting favorable conditions to regenerate. However, the conservation status of regenerated seedlings of current study is an agreement with the findings of Chowdhury, Hossain et al (2018) where they found most of the plants were belonged to the Least Concerned (LC) category in Rangamati.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, present study exceeds the findings of Nur et al (2016) where, they found 36% of the tree species (17 out of 47) are regenerating in the study area, while majority of the tree species (64%) are not getting favorable conditions to regenerate. However, the conservation status of regenerated seedlings of current study is an agreement with the findings of Chowdhury, Hossain et al (2018) where they found most of the plants were belonged to the Least Concerned (LC) category in Rangamati.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Present study showed G. nervosa had the maximum IVI (23.97) value followed by S. robusta (21.02). However, Chowdhury, Hossain, Hossain, and Khan (2018) studied regeneration diversity of Rampahar Natural Forest Reserve in Rangamati South Forest Division, where they recorded the IVI values of regenerating tree species was highest in P. serratum (50.09) followed by B. ceiba (39.37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [34], the regeneration status of a forest is poor if number of seedlings and saplings are much less than mature individuals. The regeneration status of current study is an agreement with the findings of [35] where they found most of the plants were belonged to the Least Concerned category in Rangamati.…”
Section: Regeneration Statussupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The tree species composition of DHF (56 tree species, 50 genera, 29 families) is closer in relation to tropical forest, i.e. 50 tree species in Rampahar Natural Forest Reserve (Chowdhury et al 2018a), 52 tree species in Kaptai National Park (Rahman et al 2016), 62 tree species in Tankawati natural forest (Motaleb and Hossain 2011). However, DHF also possesses lower tree species in comparison to 107 tree species in Kamalachari natural forest, Rangamati and Bandarban borderline (Hossain et al 2015), 153 tree species in Tropical Forest of Eastern Ghats, India (Reddy et al 2011) and 93 tree species in Chunati Wildlife Sanctuary (Nath et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In government managed forests of other parts of Bangladesh, many researcher investigated plant species diversity and forest stand structure (Nath et al 1998;Nath et al 2000; Motaleb and Hossain 2011; Hossain et al 2013; Feeroz and Uddin 2015;Hossain et al 2015;Chowdhury et al 2018a, b;Das et al 2018). But, Durgapur Hill Forest (DHF) lacks information regarding structural composition, stocking and conservation issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%