2023
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c04062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Native Semisynthesis of Isopeptide-Linked Substrates for Specificity Analysis of Deubiquitinases and Ubl Proteases

Zhou Zhao,
Rachel O’Dea,
Kim Wendrich
et al.

Abstract: Post-translational modifications with ubiquitin (Ub) and ubiquitin-like proteins (Ubls) are regulated by isopeptidases termed deubiquitinases (DUBs) and Ubl proteases. Here, we describe a mild chemical method for the preparation of fluorescence polarization substrates for these enzymes that is based on the activation of C-terminal Ub/Ubl hydrazides to acyl azides and their subsequent functionalization to isopeptides. The procedure is complemented by native purification routes and thus circumvents the previous … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modification of substrate proteins at target lysine residues with ISG15 is through an enzymatic cascade via an E1 (UBA7/UbE1L), E2 (UBE2L6/UBCH8), and one of three E3 ligases (HERC5, HHARI, EFP/TRIM25). USP18 [ 275 , 276 ], along with USP5, USP14, USP21 and recently USP16 and USP36, have been identified to have deISGylase activity to reverse the modification [ 277 ]. Critically, expression of ISG15 and the ISGylation machinery is stimulated by type I interferons, cytoplasmic nucleic acid detection pathways, and other cellular stresses, with ISG15 predominantly known for its role in the classical innate immune response during viral infections to limit viral replication [ 30 , 278 , 279 ].…”
Section: Ulps In Genome Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Modification of substrate proteins at target lysine residues with ISG15 is through an enzymatic cascade via an E1 (UBA7/UbE1L), E2 (UBE2L6/UBCH8), and one of three E3 ligases (HERC5, HHARI, EFP/TRIM25). USP18 [ 275 , 276 ], along with USP5, USP14, USP21 and recently USP16 and USP36, have been identified to have deISGylase activity to reverse the modification [ 277 ]. Critically, expression of ISG15 and the ISGylation machinery is stimulated by type I interferons, cytoplasmic nucleic acid detection pathways, and other cellular stresses, with ISG15 predominantly known for its role in the classical innate immune response during viral infections to limit viral replication [ 30 , 278 , 279 ].…”
Section: Ulps In Genome Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…USP18 is predominantly the deISGylase thought to act in cells particularly as its expression aligns with the interferon response and ISG15 . Other USP-family members such as USP5, USP14, USP16, USP21, and USP36 [ 277 , 287 ], have all shown deISGylase activity in vitro on top of their primary protease activity against other UBLs and/or Ub. Whether these moonlighting activities are relevant to ISG15 biology remains to be seen, but the development of specific tools to probe activity in response to DNA damage will likely aid future work.…”
Section: Ulps In Genome Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the classification into the seven families mentioned above is the most commonly used, it has to be pointed out that names of DUBs and UBL proteases might be misleading in several cases. Examples include: (1) USP18, which despite its name ( Ubiquitin-specific protease 18 ) does not recognize nor cleave ubiquitin but specifically deconjugates solely ISG15; (2) USP2, USP5, USP14 and USP21, which not exclusively cleave ubiquitinated substrates but also ISGylated proteins; (3) USP16 and USP36, which display cross-reactivity between ubiquitin, FUBI and ISG15 ( Zhao et al, 2023 ) and (4) SENP8, which despite its name does not cleave SUMO at all but exhibits specificity for NEDD8 instead ( Kunz et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical analysis is central to all fields of science, technology, engineering, and health. Strategies for the analysis of ions and organics include optical, electrochemical, and chromatographic methods . Optical methods often lack selectivity and generally require large and expensive instrumentation, and mainstream chromatographic instruments remain far from portable and inexpensive .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%