2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Native plant regeneration and introduction of non-natives following post-fire rehabilitation with straw mulch and barley seeding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
3
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(19 reference statements)
4
51
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Even the use of certified weed-free straw has been documented to increase the abundance of non-native species occurring on these construction sites following treatment [11]. Foltz [12••] tested three types of wood mulches for their effectiveness in reducing erosion from the unprotected fills following construction.…”
Section: Noxious Pestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the use of certified weed-free straw has been documented to increase the abundance of non-native species occurring on these construction sites following treatment [11]. Foltz [12••] tested three types of wood mulches for their effectiveness in reducing erosion from the unprotected fills following construction.…”
Section: Noxious Pestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the low specific weights can also be a disadvantage, especially in areas prone to strong winds during the period between straw application and the first heavy rainfall events . Negative ecological effects of straw mulches were pointed out by Kruse et al (2004), such as the reduction of the density of conifer seedlings and the involuntary introduction of non-native seeds. Wood chips were found to have little effect in reducing post-fire soil losses in various studies (Kim et al, 2008;Riechers et al, 2008;Fernández et al, 2011).…”
Section: Mitigation Of Soil Erosion Following Wildfiresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many countries, seeding of fast-growing non-native grass species is the most common post-fire stabilisation technique to rapidly increase plant cover because of its relatively low cost and easy aircraft application (Robichaud et al 2000;Beyers 2004). However, this practice has been questioned because it can introduce exotic species (Kruse et al 2004) and displace native species, interfering with natural vegetation recovery (Beyers 2004). Furthermore, grass seeding could be ineffective in increasing ground cover or reducing erosion rates during the first critical rain events after a fire (Robichaud et al 2006;Wagenbrenner et al 2006;Groen and Woods 2008;Peppin et al 2010;Fernandez et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%