Native Connection to Place: Policies and Play

Martin, Rena

doi:10.1353/aiq.2001.0008

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Such connections are often deeply emotional, spiritual and evocative of memory of place. Connections in this sense are strongly related to the past context of relationships that have fostered or hindered access and sharing of land and resources (Martin, ). If memory is connected to being separated or oppressed, the emotional connection can be painful (Walker, ).…”

Section: Collaboration In Governance As a Form Of On‐going Reconciliamentioning

confidence: 99%

Leveling the Playing Field: Fostering Collaborative Governance Towards On‐Going Reconciliation

Zurba

2013

Env Pol Gov

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper looks at the potential for collaborative governance for land and resources to become a form of on‐going reconciliation in societies transitioning from past oppression and on‐going social injustice. Structural violence in the form of capacity disparities and policy configuration are explored in order to frame the discussion. Canada and South Africa are presented as two countries that have been going through different experiences in terms of transition, but have had similar experiences in regards to a need to foster new ways of working towards more equitable forms of governance. Here, much like reconciliation, governance is presented as a process, which under the right conditions can lead to relationship building and mutually desirable outcomes. This process creates a platform for establishing common ground, as well as the potential to negotiate solutions to structural violence. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

show abstract

Section: Collaboration In Governance As a Form Of On‐going Reconciliamentioning

confidence: 99%

Leveling the Playing Field: Fostering Collaborative Governance Towards On‐Going Reconciliation

Zurba

2013

Env Pol Gov

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Homelands and indigenous identities in a multiracial era

Liebler

2010

Social Science Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research Article: Public Lands Litigation Alliances between Native American and Public Interest Groups

Freedman

Fridgen

2007

Environmental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Native American tribes and organizations and other public interest groups, including environmental and religious ones, sometimes partner in litigation about public lands management. This study examines three such litigation alliances involving disputes over National Park Service and US Forest Service policies and management concerning public land containing sites considered sacred by Native Americans. Specifically, it explores factors such as trust, complementary resources, and compatibility that are considered in deciding whether to create a litigation alliance between indigenous and non-indigenous partners. Questions asked in this research relate to the Yin method of case study research: How did these alliances come about and why were these allies chosen? More importantly, what are the key elements in a successful alliance? Based on the proposition that "organizations collaborate (ally) because they derive mutual benefits," this article explores, through archival research and interview format, what really happened in three landmark cases litigated on a national level. Environmental Practice 9: 12-27 (2007)

show abstract

Native Connection to Place: Policies and Play

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Leveling the Playing Field: Fostering Collaborative Governance Towards On‐Going Reconciliation

Leveling the Playing Field: Fostering Collaborative Governance Towards On‐Going Reconciliation

Homelands and indigenous identities in a multiracial era

Research Article: Public Lands Litigation Alliances between Native American and Public Interest Groups

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About