2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Native American population data based on the Globalfiler ® autosomal STR loci

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values for matching probability (MP), power of discrimination (PD), polymorphism information content (PIC), power of exclusion (PE) duos, typical paternity index (TPI), gene diversity (GD), and expected heterozygosity (He) were calculated by using the PowerStats software (Ver 1.2, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) [14]. Nei's standard genetic distance between current and previously published reference populations (Law et al, 2002;Berti et al, 2005;Tie et al, 2006;Barni et al, 2007;Deng et al, 2007;Maruyama et al, 2008;Demeter et al, 2010;Stepanov et al, 2010;Zhu et al, 2010;Deng et al, 2011;Kee et al, 2011;Xing et al, 2011;Yoo et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2012;Di Cristofaro et al, 2012;Westen et al, 2012;Gaviria et al, 2013;Hedjazi et al, 2013;Nasibov et al, 2013Nasibov et al, , 2013Park et al, 2013;Bentayebi et al, 2014;Fujii et al, 2014;Almeida et al, 2015;Gurkan et al, 2015;Parolin et al, 2015;Shafique et al, 2015;Shrivastava et al, 2015;Zhang, 2015bZhang, , 2015aZhang et al, 2015;Aguilar-Velázquez et al, 2016;Hossain et al, 2016;Nakamura et al, 2016;Ng et al, 2016;Park et al, 2016;Ramos-González et al, 2016;Ristow et ...…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values for matching probability (MP), power of discrimination (PD), polymorphism information content (PIC), power of exclusion (PE) duos, typical paternity index (TPI), gene diversity (GD), and expected heterozygosity (He) were calculated by using the PowerStats software (Ver 1.2, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) [14]. Nei's standard genetic distance between current and previously published reference populations (Law et al, 2002;Berti et al, 2005;Tie et al, 2006;Barni et al, 2007;Deng et al, 2007;Maruyama et al, 2008;Demeter et al, 2010;Stepanov et al, 2010;Zhu et al, 2010;Deng et al, 2011;Kee et al, 2011;Xing et al, 2011;Yoo et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2012;Di Cristofaro et al, 2012;Westen et al, 2012;Gaviria et al, 2013;Hedjazi et al, 2013;Nasibov et al, 2013Nasibov et al, , 2013Park et al, 2013;Bentayebi et al, 2014;Fujii et al, 2014;Almeida et al, 2015;Gurkan et al, 2015;Parolin et al, 2015;Shafique et al, 2015;Shrivastava et al, 2015;Zhang, 2015bZhang, , 2015aZhang et al, 2015;Aguilar-Velázquez et al, 2016;Hossain et al, 2016;Nakamura et al, 2016;Ng et al, 2016;Park et al, 2016;Ramos-González et al, 2016;Ristow et ...…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To comprehensively dissect the genetic background of Shanxi northern-Han Chinese, we first integrated our raw genotyping data (23 STRs) with previously published genotype data from 11 Chinese populations from five Chinese ethnic groups (Han, Hui, Tibetan, Yi, and Uyghur) (He et al, 2018b; Wang et al, 2018a; Chen et al, 2019; Liu et al, 2019). To further explore the genetic relationship of Shanxi Han in the context of the genetic variations from the worldwide or nationwide populations, we subsequently combined our allele frequency of 20 STRs with publicly obtained data from 52 worldwide populations (Westen et al, 2012; Gaviria et al, 2013; Park et al, 2013; Fujii et al, 2014; Almeida et al, 2015; Parolin et al, 2015; Aguilar-Velazquez et al, 2016; Hossain et al, 2016; Ng et al, 2016; Park et al, 2016; Ramos-Gonzalez et al, 2016; Ristow et al, 2016; Vullo et al, 2016; Wang, 2016; Zhang et al, 2016a; Zhang et al, 2016b; Choi et al, 2017; Guerreiro et al, 2017; Jin et al, 2017; Liu et al, 2017; Moyses et al, 2017; Ossowski et al, 2017; Singh and Nandineni, 2017; Taylor et al, 2017; Wu et al, 2017; Yang et al, 2017a; He et al, 2018b; He et al, 2018e; Wang et al, 2018a; Liu et al, 2019) and allele frequency of 19 STRs with previously investigated the allele frequency distribution from 60 Chinese populations (Zhang et al, 2011; Zhang, 2012; Liu et al, 2013; Shen, 2013; Zhang, 2013; Wang, 2014; Wang et al, 2014; Xie, 2014; Hu et al, 2015; Li, 2015; Ruan, 2015; Shen et al, 2015; Wang, 2015; Yin, 2015; Zhang and Chen, 2015; Zhao et al, 2015a; Huang, 2016; Meng, 2016; Wang, 2016; Xiang, 2016; Xiao et al, 2016; Zhao, 2016; Chen et al, 2017; Fu et al, 2017; He et al, 2017a; He et al, 2017c; Jin et al, 2017; Liu, 2017; Lu et al, 2017;…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed locus-by-locus pairwise comparisons (F st ) and calculated Nei’s standard genetic distances (R st ) between our three studied populations and 47 previously published worldwide populations (Asian 9,15–29 , North American 3032 , European 3336 , Oceanian 37 , South American 3841 and South African 42 populations) based on allele frequencies of 20 expanded CODIS loci to infer interpopulation similarity and differentiation (Supplementary Tables S10–S13 and Fig. S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%