2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.03.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nationwide salpingectomy rates for an indication of permanent contraception before and after published practice guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the Kazakhstani national guidelines for female surgical sterilization, the procedure is currently performed via tubal ligation, rather than salpingectomy. However, in developed countries that have accepted an opportunistic salpingectomy as a preventative measure for ovarian cancer, rates of salpingectomies for permanent contraception are steadily increasing [ 47 , 48 ]. As reported by researchers, in the USA, 14.8% of subjects underwent a salpingectomy for permanent contraception within a 5-year period (2013–2017) [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the Kazakhstani national guidelines for female surgical sterilization, the procedure is currently performed via tubal ligation, rather than salpingectomy. However, in developed countries that have accepted an opportunistic salpingectomy as a preventative measure for ovarian cancer, rates of salpingectomies for permanent contraception are steadily increasing [ 47 , 48 ]. As reported by researchers, in the USA, 14.8% of subjects underwent a salpingectomy for permanent contraception within a 5-year period (2013–2017) [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in developed countries that have accepted an opportunistic salpingectomy as a preventative measure for ovarian cancer, rates of salpingectomies for permanent contraception are steadily increasing [ 47 , 48 ]. As reported by researchers, in the USA, 14.8% of subjects underwent a salpingectomy for permanent contraception within a 5-year period (2013–2017) [ 47 ]. According to these studies, laparoscopic bilateral salpingectomy is found to be a safe method for sterilization [ 23 , 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, physicians practicing in academic hospitals appear to be more likely to respond to emerging evidence. 6,10 This has been argued to be due to increased patient volume and consistent exposure to learners. Our results demonstrate the CH decline following the 2011 AUA CPG was greater in teaching hospitals relative to nonteaching hospitals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the embracement of this strategy at the time of cesarean delivery for pregnant women who desire permanent sterilization has not been widely adopted, probably due to a lack of available data including the surgical and psychological data in this setting ( 14 ) . By 2017, the overall proportion of salpingectomies in patients who underwent a permanent contraception procedure was reported to be as high as 61.5%, in a nationwide data analysis ( 15 ) . In a large retrospective cohort study of seven years, almost half of the women preferred OBS as the mode of contraception at either elective or unscheduled cesarean section, which implies that OBS has a high acceptable rate for its higher contraceptive efficacy and risk-reduction benefit for ovarian cancer ( 16 ) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%