Nations’ income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content

Durante, Federica; Kervyn, Nicolas; Cuddy, Amy J. C.; Akande, Adebowale; Adetoun, Bolanle E.; Adewuyi, Modupe; Tserere, Magdeline M.; Ramiah, Ananthi Al; Mastor, Khairul Anwar; Barlow, Fiona Kate; Bonn, Gregory; Tafarodi, Romin W.; Bosak, Janine; Cairns, Ed; Doherty, Claire; Capozza, Dora; Chandran, Anjana; Chryssochoou, Xénia; Iatridis, Tilemachos; Contreras, Juan Manuel; Costa-Lopes, Rui; González, Roberto; Lewis, Janet I.; Tushabe, Gerald; Leyens, Jacques‐Philippe; Mayorga, Renée; Rouhana, Nadim N.; Castro, Vanessa Smith; Pérez, Roland; Rodríguez‐Bailón, Rosa; Moya, Miguel; Marente, Elena Morales; Gálvez, Marisol Palacios; Sibley, Chris G.; Asbrock, Frank; Storari, Chiara

doi:10.4324/9781315187280-10

Cited by 11 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As far as we know, this SCM validation study employed the largest sample size in mainland China so far. The findings support the cross-cultural generalizability of the SCM (Bai, Ramos, & Fiske, 2020;Cuddy et al, 2009;Durante et al, 2013;Durante et al, 2017;Fiske & Durante, 2016;Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002;Fiske, Cuddy, & Glick, 2007) and validate previous research in China (Cuddy et al, 2009;Gao, 2010;Guan & Cheng, 2011;Shi & Wang, 2017;Wu, Bai, & Fiske, 2018;Yuan, 2009). As predicted, 35 of 41 groups received ambient stereotype and in-group (undergraduates) and social reference groups were assessed as both high in warmth dimension and high in component dimension.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

“…The results of the categorization of social groups would determine how others perceive and treat them. SCM has been tested and validated in multiple countries and regions (Bai, Ramos, & Fiske, 2020;Cuddy et al, 2009;Durante et al, 2013;Durante et al, 2017), such as German (Asbrock, 2010), Norway (Bye, Herrebrøden, Hjetland, Røyset, & Westby, 2014), Romania (Stanciu, Cohrs, Hanke, & Gavreliuc, 2017), Russia (Grigoryev, Fiske, & Batkhina, 2019). Although some variations were revealed, the universality of component and warmth was largely confirmed (Fiske, 2017(Fiske, , 2018Fiske & Durante, 2016;Fiske, Cuddy, & Glick, 2007).…”

Section: Stereotype Content Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Stereotypes of social groups in mainland China in terms of warmth and competence: Evidence from a large undergraduate sample

Ji¹,

杨亚平²,

Fan³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) has been validated in multiple countries and regions. However, the previous validation studies in China were limited by small sample size. The current research enlarged sample size (n = 184 in pilot study and n = 1315 in formal study) to validate SCM in mainland China. Supporting the SCM, 41 social groups were clustered into four quadrants based on warmth and component dimensions. In addition, 24 typical social groups were selected and a list of stereotype words for these groups was developed. The implications of the emerging social groups and the applications of this stereotype words list were discussed.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Section: Stereotype Content Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stereotypes of social groups in mainland China in terms of warmth and competence: Evidence from a large undergraduate sample

Ji¹,

杨亚平²,

Fan³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To that database, we added new SCM data collected in Finland (Durante, Fiske, Mähönen, & Jasinskaja, ), Egypt, Jordan, Turkey, and Pakistan (Durante, Fiske, Gelfand, & Stillwell, ); SCM data from Norway were collected independently by Bye, Herrebrøden, Hjetland, Røyset, and Westby (), and reanalyzed here. Both “rich” and “poor” groups were evaluated by all these samples, except for Pakistan, which had listed only the “poor” as a salient group.…”

Section: Study 1: Across Nations Income Inequality Moderates Stereotmentioning

confidence: 99%

Poor but Warm, Rich but Cold (and Competent): Social Classes in the Stereotype Content Model

Durante

Tablante

Fiske

2017

Journal of Social Issues

Self Cite

182

170

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This motivation may be especially relevant for group members who are willing to overcome conflictual intergroup relationships (e.g., over scarce resources) or would like to promote cooperation. Conversely, this motivation is presumably absent when there is no status asymmetry between groups as well as in highly conflictual contexts (Cambon, Yzerbyt, & Yakimova, 2015;Durante et al, 2017;Durante et al, 2013), or when there are few incentives to interact, as often the case in minimal group scenarios.…”

Section: Accounting For the Dimensional Compensation Effectmentioning

confidence: 99%

Direct and indirect dimensional compensation: Is there a difference between observers and group members?

Schmitz

Yzerbyt

2020

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dimensional compensation takes place when perceivers judge one of two social targets higher on one of the two fundamental dimensions while judging the other target higher on the second dimension. Interestingly, the majority of studies on the dimensional compensation effect focused on direct measures, with almost no attempt to rely on more indirect measures. We tested whether dimensional compensation also takes place at a more indirect level (Brief-IAT). In Experiment 1, observers presented with unknown groups dimensionally compensated both directly and indirectly. Experiment 2 had participants assigned to one of two novel groups. Whereas low-competence group members dimensionally compensated on both direct and indirect measures, high-competence group members dimensionally compensated at the direct level but did not conceed any advantage to the low-competence group at the indirect level. As a set, our findings shed new light on direct and indirect dimensionally compensatory judgments as a function of perceivers’ vantage points as observers and group members.

show abstract

Nations’ income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content

Cited by 11 publications

References 1 publication

Stereotypes of social groups in mainland China in terms of warmth and competence: Evidence from a large undergraduate sample

Stereotypes of social groups in mainland China in terms of warmth and competence: Evidence from a large undergraduate sample

Poor but Warm, Rich but Cold (and Competent): Social Classes in the Stereotype Content Model

Direct and indirect dimensional compensation: Is there a difference between observers and group members?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About