2008
DOI: 10.1080/19331680801979070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nationalizing and Normalizing the Local? A Comparative Analysis of Online Candidate Campaigning in Australia and Britain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, incumbency and ideology have both been used as predictors of online activity sophistication. Regarding the former of these, because more established political actors could be expected to gain more coverage in established media such as print or broadcast (Vergeer and Hermans, 2013), challengers have been found to try to counter this dominance by employing new communication technologies to larger extents (Carlson, 2007;Druckman et al, 2007;Gibson, Lusoli, & Ward, 2008;Jackson & Lilleker, 2009), a finding that appears to have been at least partly challenged in the supposed 2.0 era (Williams & Gulati, 2012). As for the latter, the influence of ideology has been reported as fluctuating.…”
Section: Candidate Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, incumbency and ideology have both been used as predictors of online activity sophistication. Regarding the former of these, because more established political actors could be expected to gain more coverage in established media such as print or broadcast (Vergeer and Hermans, 2013), challengers have been found to try to counter this dominance by employing new communication technologies to larger extents (Carlson, 2007;Druckman et al, 2007;Gibson, Lusoli, & Ward, 2008;Jackson & Lilleker, 2009), a finding that appears to have been at least partly challenged in the supposed 2.0 era (Williams & Gulati, 2012). As for the latter, the influence of ideology has been reported as fluctuating.…”
Section: Candidate Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the pairing of innovation (sometimes equalization) and normalization is used quite often to denote different views on the topic at hand (e.g. Gibson et al, 2008;Larsson and Svensson, 2014;Margolis and Resnick, 2000). The former of these terms suggests that as the Internet allows politicians to "communicate directly with citizens without direct interference from the mass media" (Hermans and Vergeer, 2013: 74), such possibilities for increased interaction would be incorporated by those seeking public office.…”
Section: Permanent Campaigning: Traces Of Normalization or Innovation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in a recent comparative paper, it was found that that marginality has a significant impact in the UK and a non-significant impact in Australia. 25 We test this hypothesis in the Irish case at the candidate level, assessing whether candidates are more likely to establish campaign websites when their chances of winning a seat are marginal.…”
Section: Yes Nomentioning
confidence: 99%