2019
DOI: 10.1080/1369183x.2019.1620596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nationalist narratives and anti-Immigrant attitudes: exceptionalism and collective victimhood in contemporary Israel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surely a number of variables, including some we control for in our regression models, but also some outside the purview of this article, shape the structure of popular nationalism in countries—including other sorts of legacy effects. Beyond collective memories of victimhood or conflict, nationalist imaginaries may draw on narratives of exceptionalism that flow from a deep “belief in the cultural uniqueness, moral superiority, and predestined (for some, divine) mission of the nation” (Feinstein and Bonikowski 2019:749). This is consistent with the narratives and myths associated with Christian nationalism in the United States, in which America is venerated as a redeemer nation whose superiority and imperial ambitions were ordained by God (Whitehead and Perry 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surely a number of variables, including some we control for in our regression models, but also some outside the purview of this article, shape the structure of popular nationalism in countries—including other sorts of legacy effects. Beyond collective memories of victimhood or conflict, nationalist imaginaries may draw on narratives of exceptionalism that flow from a deep “belief in the cultural uniqueness, moral superiority, and predestined (for some, divine) mission of the nation” (Feinstein and Bonikowski 2019:749). This is consistent with the narratives and myths associated with Christian nationalism in the United States, in which America is venerated as a redeemer nation whose superiority and imperial ambitions were ordained by God (Whitehead and Perry 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows us to account for effects of geopolitical threat that are heterogeneous within and across dimensions. Beyond its effects on pride, we expect higher degrees of national trauma will tighten membership criteria (following Hiers et al 2017; see also Feinstein and Bonikowski 2019). Yet, the meaning of these shifts is difficult to fully understand when analyzing dimensions separately.…”
Section: Conceptualizing and Measuring Popular Nationalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, memories of historical events were found to predict attitudes toward asylum policies in Israel (Ariely, 2019). Similarly, narratives of Israel's historical events predicted participants' attitudes toward immigrants and immigration policies (Feinstein & Bonikowski, 2019). In addition, results from a case study illustrated that in some contexts, manipulation of collective memories of historical events could serve as a tool to shape people's attitudes toward the government, maintaining the status quo of the government and preventing the public to seek democracy (Belmonte & Rochlitz, 2017).…”
Section: Living Historical Memories Predict Identities and Attitudes Toward The Nationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The more students are exposed to content that encourages an exclusive form of national identification, the less that education is effective at attenuating hostility towards immigrants. With the growing concern about the prominence of nationalistic narratives in school curricula and textbooks across many countries such as Hungary, Japan, Scotland, and the United States (Goldstein, 2020;Feinstein and Bonikowski, 2019;Grever and Van der Vlies, 2017;Morris, Shimazu and Vickers, 2014), my paper suggests that emphasizing a narrower and more exclusive form of national identification is likely to increase outgroup hostility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…My paper makes two important contributions. First, it contributes to the long-standing literature on national identity formation and exclusionary attitudes towards immigrants by highlighting the role that education plays in promoting different types of nationalist narratives (Brubaker, 1992;Hiers, Soehl and Wimmer, 2017;Feinstein and Bonikowski, 2019). The more students are exposed to content that encourages an exclusive form of national identification, the less that education is effective at attenuating hostility towards immigrants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%