Nationalism and national identity formation in Bangladesh: A colonial legacy behind the clash of language and religion

Abstract

<jats:p> The nature of identity formation is complex. The production of identity in South Asia, with its colonial past, has been largely dependent on the region’s colonial history. In this article we chart the process of political identity formation in Bangladesh. We identify the various historical causes that led to the creation of each of the two types of identity prevalent today. These two divisive identities based on language and religion, one pitted against the other, each became the central platform of each of the two major political parties, the Awami League (AL) and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP). This disquisition shows clear patterns of political distress that resulted in the bifurcation of these two divisive political identities that ossified by the late 20th century due chiefly to the actions of the colonial government of the Raj. </jats:p>

Doing our best and doing no harm: A focused ethnography of staff moral experiences of providing palliative care at a Médecins Sans Frontières pediatric hospital in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh

“…Since most national staff doctors did not have specialized pediatric training when they began working at Goyalmara, international pediatricians were hired to support the team. The authority of international staff at Goyalmara was connected to their positions as managers in the human resources hierarchy, their specialized expertise in pediatrics, as well as the pervasive deference to foreigners that is a legacy of British colonialism in Bangladesh [ 60 ].…”

Charisma, populism, and the formation of national identity: Sheikh Mujib and Bengali nationalism

“…The 'emergence of populism is historically linked to a crisis of the dominant ideological discourse, which is, in turn, part of a more general social crisis' (Laclau, 2015b, p. 134). This general social crisis was brought on in East Bengal primarily due to the India-Pakistan war of 1965, which saw East Bengal left high and dry, both in the arenas of defence and economy, by its Western counterpart (Hajjaj, 2020). Not only was India the province's biggest international trading partner, but the two shared also more than 4000 km of shared land border.…”

“…It jettisons Aristotle's ideas of the menial classes and hails the rule of the non‐elite masses, as the people are defined in opposition to the elites holding political power. Hence in South Africa, the people are the disenfranchised black majority (Howarth, 2005), and in 1960s East Bengal, the Bengali speaking publics (Hajjaj, 2020). This newly self‐recognised form of the public chooses their leader (Fairhurst & Uhl‐Bien, 2012; Shamir, 2007; Uhl‐Bien, 2006) for their combined voices' totemic and praxis representation: an amalgamation of a multitude of antagonisms forged against the elite others .…”

Co constructing National Identity in the Era of Identity Chaos

“…In post-independent India, fabric of national integration was designed brick by brick, with contrast to the colonial period. During the nineteenth century, sub-national identities were reinforced by colonial administrators for segregating Indians and ease of governance 9 . Although Indian national identity is overshadowed by the sub-national identities, Indian culture is engrossed by metaphysical belief system since Vedic ages 10 .…”