2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National versus global modelling the 3D distribution of soil organic carbon in mainland France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
1
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
64
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The uncertainty in the simulation of P TOT was high in North America and western Russia (coefficient of variation of the simulations performed with drivers varying within their range of uncertaintỹ 60%) and low in China and Europe (~20%; Fig. GlobalSoil-Map (Mulder et al, 2016), SoilGrid 1 km (Hengl et al, 2014)) could help to increase our confidence in simulated soil P maps. A similar spatial pattern was found for P ILAB despite higher uncertainty in North America, Africa and Argentina (Fig.…”
Section: Distribution Of P Tot and P Ilab At The Global Scale And Assmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The uncertainty in the simulation of P TOT was high in North America and western Russia (coefficient of variation of the simulations performed with drivers varying within their range of uncertaintỹ 60%) and low in China and Europe (~20%; Fig. GlobalSoil-Map (Mulder et al, 2016), SoilGrid 1 km (Hengl et al, 2014)) could help to increase our confidence in simulated soil P maps. A similar spatial pattern was found for P ILAB despite higher uncertainty in North America, Africa and Argentina (Fig.…”
Section: Distribution Of P Tot and P Ilab At The Global Scale And Assmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing resolution of soil data sets (e.g. GlobalSoil-Map (Mulder et al, 2016), SoilGrid 1 km (Hengl et al, 2014)) could help to increase our confidence in simulated soil P maps. Despite the large uncertainty in the distribution of P TOT and P ILAB , we were able to robustly decipher the relative contribution of the drivers of global soil P distribution (see following and small error-bars in Fig.…”
Section: Distribution Of P Tot and P Ilab At The Global Scale And Assmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous studies have used legacy soil data (Aitkenhead and Coull, 2016;Minasny et al, 2013;Mulder et al, 2016 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, there are experiments conducted on almost regular and dense grids, most of which focus on small areas [Lacoste et al, 2014, Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi et al, 2016 and other where the sampling strategy significantly varies across space [Mondal et al, 2016]. The latter studies mainly correspond to regional or even greater scales [Reijneveld et al, 2009, Sreenivas et al, 2016, with only few cases where an optimal sample density is maintained at a national level [Mulder et al, 2016]. The characteristics of environment under study can require the use of different predictors capable of explaining the variability of soil traits, topography and standing biocoenosis, especially (cropped or natural) phytocoenosis, the latter being efficiently explained by remotely sensed (RS) properties [Morellos et al, 2016, Peng et al, 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%