National Summit on Legal Preparedness for Obesity Prevention and Control

Benken, Donald E.; Reynolds, Meredith S.; Hunter, Alicia S.

doi:10.1111/j.1748-720x.2009.00384.x

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…2 This paper uses the "laws and legal authorities" component of the framework and should be considered in combination with the competencies, coordination, and information-best practices components of the framework. 3 Throughout this paper we provide examples of how current laws and legal authorities affect the public health goal of preventing obesity in both a positive and negative way.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Laws and Legal Authorities for Obesity Prevention and Control

Gostin

Pomeranz

Jacobson³

et al. 2009

J. Law. Med. Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Law is an essential tool for public health practice, and the use of a systematic legal framework can assist with preventing chronic diseases and addressing the growing epidemic of obesity.The action options available to government at the federal, state, local, and tribal levels and its partners can help make the population healthier by preventing obesity and decreasing the growing burden of associated chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease and Type 2 diabetes. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) uses the four-part systematic legal framework commonly referred to as “public health legal preparedness” to demonstrate the essential role law can play for any public health issue. This paper uses the “laws and legal authorities” component of the framework and should be considered in combination with the competencies, coordination, and information-best practices components of the framework.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Laws and Legal Authorities for Obesity Prevention and Control

Gostin

Pomeranz

Jacobson³

et al. 2009

J. Law. Med. Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Obesity Epidemic: Towards a Regulatory Framework to Combat Obesity in New Zealand

Barker¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<p>There is currently a global obesity epidemic and New Zealand, like many other countries, has high levels of obesity both in the adult and child population. This presents a threat to society due to the risk to individual and population health, and the impact on public services. A major contributor to obesity levels is the nature of the current eating environment; one in which various factors make it natural and easy to lead an unhealthy lifestyle. By targeting these, the law could help to combat the obesity epidemic. Historically, attempts to address obesity through legal means have encountered opposition on paternalistic grounds. Given the threat that obesity poses, both to the individual and society as a whole, a certain level of paternalism is justified to control it, particularly when it comes to the protection of children. Currently, legal measures to control obesity can be implemented in New Zealand without resorting to hard paternalism. The law should be used to increase regulation of the food industry, rather than using it to control food intake directly. This is a softer paternalistic approach and includes changes to labelling requirements and the regulation of the marketing to mandate for improved information to be disseminated about food products. It also includes the implementation of a universal nutrient profiling system to overcome any problems associated with deciding which food products should be subject to increased regulation. Change to the eating environment in New Zealand could also be facilitated via the implementation of a fat-tax to address the price inequalities between healthy and unhealthy food products. Currently the food industry in New Zealand is minimally regulated by statute, with an emphasis on food safety and hygiene. This is no longer appropriate given rising levels of obesity. Furthermore, it is no longer appropriate that food product marketing be regulated by the industry, given its contribution to obesity levels, and the obvious conflict of interest. Notwithstanding that obesity control in New Zealand can presently be tackled using such an approach, a higher level of paternalism is necessary for measures aimed at children. Therefore, in the current food environment, paternalistic health laws, designed to protect children, are justified on the basis of the risk to children, and the need to protect them. Additionally, the need for a more paternalistic approach to obesity control generally must be kept under continual review, particularly in light of studies linking food with addiction. Although food litigation has been initiated against food companies by the obese in other jurisdictions, and has had an impact on the eating environment, this is not a realistic prospect in New Zealand, even as a last resort, in the absence of appropriate regulation.</p>

show abstract

National Summit on Legal Preparedness for Obesity Prevention and Control

Cited by 2 publications

References 1 publication

Assessing Laws and Legal Authorities for Obesity Prevention and Control

Assessing Laws and Legal Authorities for Obesity Prevention and Control

The Obesity Epidemic: Towards a Regulatory Framework to Combat Obesity in New Zealand

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About