2009
DOI: 10.1057/elmr.2009.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National Statistician’s article: measuring regional economic performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some regions will have a high proportion of children, which will tend to depress amounts per head. The appropriate use of GVA per head as an indicator is discussed in the National Statistician's article: Measuring regional economic performance (Dunnell 2008).…”
Section: Diversity Of the Nuts1 Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some regions will have a high proportion of children, which will tend to depress amounts per head. The appropriate use of GVA per head as an indicator is discussed in the National Statistician's article: Measuring regional economic performance (Dunnell 2008).…”
Section: Diversity Of the Nuts1 Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policymakers frequently use GVA per head as a headline indicator of regional productivity and of regional incomes when comparing and benchmarking regions that diff er in geographical size, economic output and population. However, as Dunnell (2009) has explained, productivity and income are very diff erent concepts. GVA per head is calculated as the simple ratio of the economic activity in a region divided by the number of people living in a region, while productivity is defi ned as the ratio of GVA divided by the labour input (jobs or hours worked) used to create it.…”
Section: Headline Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure income as the key determinant of welfare in a region, Gross Disposable Household Income (GDHI) is the preferred measure. While it is the case that policymakers oft en use GVA per head as a measure of regional income (and welfare) of people living in a region, GDHI is preferable because as Dunnell (2009) has explained, GVA per head has several weaknesses as a measure. For example, GVA is an indicator of activity and does not take account of people commuting in and out of regions to work, or to other sources of income which are unrelated to current work, such as pensions and investment incomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policymakers frequently use GVA per head as a headline indicator of regional productivity and of regional incomes when comparing and benchmarking regions that diff er in geographical size, economic output and population. However, as Dunnell (2009) has explained, productivity and income are very diff erent concepts.…”
Section: Headline Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%