1969
DOI: 10.1080/01463376909368864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National rhetorics and inter‐cultural communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I think the facts of life indicate that there is not just one rhetoric-instead, there are many different modes of thinking, and many different ways in which influence must be exerted if it is to be effective, (pp. 79-80) From an anthropological point of view, Huber W. Ellingsworth (1969) views "rhetorics as the communication styles of a particular culture, including appropriate themes, modes of expression, standards, purposes, sources, and receivers of communication." (p. 35) These relativistic views commonly argue that rhetoric as a field of research and skill in oral communication exists universally even if it has not systematically developed to the extent in the West.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I think the facts of life indicate that there is not just one rhetoric-instead, there are many different modes of thinking, and many different ways in which influence must be exerted if it is to be effective, (pp. 79-80) From an anthropological point of view, Huber W. Ellingsworth (1969) views "rhetorics as the communication styles of a particular culture, including appropriate themes, modes of expression, standards, purposes, sources, and receivers of communication." (p. 35) These relativistic views commonly argue that rhetoric as a field of research and skill in oral communication exists universally even if it has not systematically developed to the extent in the West.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%