National Performance Reporting as a Driver for National M&amp;E Development

Lahey, Robert

doi:10.1596/9780821398791_ch12

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Rist and others (2011) identify eight domains to assess within an M&E system: the crossing of institutional, human, technical, and fi nancial capacities with demand and supply sides. Lahey (2013) identifi es four building blocks for a national M&E system: the vision, an enabling environment, the capacity to supply M&E information, and the capacity to demand and use M&E information.…”

Section: Analytical Framework To Diagnose Mande Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development Evaluation in Times of Turbulence

Rist¹,

Boily²,

Martin³

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 16 15 14 13 This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. Note that The World Bank does not necessarily own each component of the content included in the work. The World Bank therefore does not warrant that the use of the content contained in the work will not infringe on the rights of third parties. The risk of claims resulting from such infringement rests solely with you. The fi ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily refl ect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifi cally reserved.

show abstract

Section: Analytical Framework To Diagnose Mande Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development Evaluation in Times of Turbulence

Rist¹,

Boily²,

Martin³

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Why Developing Monitoring and Evaluation Capacity Is Critical to Understanding and Addressing Issues of Poverty and Inequality

Lahey¹

2015

Poverty, Inequality, and Evaluation: Changing Perspectives

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Neutral Assessment of the National Research Council Canada Evaluation Function

Fraser¹,

Tremblay

Bourgeois

et al. 2013

Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Federal government departments and agencies are required to conduct a neutral assessment of their evaluation function once every five years under the Treasury Board Secretariat’s Policy on Evaluation (2009). This article describes the National Research Council’s experience conducting the first neutral assessment of its evaluation function. Based on learning from this first assessment, best practices that NRC intends on replicating, as well as lessons learned for future assessments, are discussed. This article may be of interest to both federal and non-federal organizations seeking to conduct a neutral assessment in an effort to improve their evaluation services and products.

show abstract

National Performance Reporting as a Driver for National M&E Development

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Development Evaluation in Times of Turbulence

Development Evaluation in Times of Turbulence

Why Developing Monitoring and Evaluation Capacity Is Critical to Understanding and Addressing Issues of Poverty and Inequality

Neutral Assessment of the National Research Council Canada Evaluation Function

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About