2012
DOI: 10.1057/cep.2012.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National models of immigrant integration: The costs for comparative research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the on-going debate about so-called 'national models of integration' has interpreted certain naturalisation requirements as signs of a state philosophy of assimilation, multiculturalism, or republicanism. The classification of countries' naturalisation requirements are invoked both in arguments for the existence of national models of integration (Hammar, 1985;Brubaker, 1992;Castles, 1995;Banting and Kymlicka, 2013) and against their existence (Favell, 2003;Bertossi and Duyvendak 2013). Scholars also point to naturalisation policies as evidence of integration policy convergence across Europe (Joppke 2007a;Carrera 2009;Banting and Kymlicka, 2013) or divergence (Jacobs and Rea, 2007;Koopmans, Michalowski and Waibel, 2012).…”
Section: Theorising the Link Between Naturalisation And Integration Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the on-going debate about so-called 'national models of integration' has interpreted certain naturalisation requirements as signs of a state philosophy of assimilation, multiculturalism, or republicanism. The classification of countries' naturalisation requirements are invoked both in arguments for the existence of national models of integration (Hammar, 1985;Brubaker, 1992;Castles, 1995;Banting and Kymlicka, 2013) and against their existence (Favell, 2003;Bertossi and Duyvendak 2013). Scholars also point to naturalisation policies as evidence of integration policy convergence across Europe (Joppke 2007a;Carrera 2009;Banting and Kymlicka, 2013) or divergence (Jacobs and Rea, 2007;Koopmans, Michalowski and Waibel, 2012).…”
Section: Theorising the Link Between Naturalisation And Integration Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, various scholars have emphasised how migration research often tended to reify specific national models of integration (Bertossi 2011;Scholten 2011;Bertossi and Duyvendak 2012). A national model would involve a nationally and historically rooted approach to migrant integration, which would be strongly institutionalised in national policies and would determine the national discourses on migrant integration.…”
Section: Knowledge Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, models also tend to oversimplify policies and overemphasise the alleged coherency and consistency of these policies (see Bertossi and Duyvendak 2012). Policy practices tend to be far more resilient and diverse than most policy models would suggest.…”
Section: National Models Of Integration: a Critical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognising that researchers can and often do play a key role in such discourse coalitions also means recognising that the notion of models used by scholars is heteronomous: academic discussions about models are pervaded by normative, political and moral interests, which stem from ideological debates in the public arena in which scholars also take part (Bowen 2007;Scholten 2009;Bertossi and Duyvendak 2012). The problem here is that scholarly notions of integration models reflect and are influenced by public debates, which in turn are structured by the frames of the dominant elite, which includes influential scholars (see Scholten 2011).…”
Section: Migration Research and The Coproduction Of Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%