2010
DOI: 10.1080/00220380903131654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National Model of Technological Catching Up and Innovation: Comparing Patents of Taiwan and South Korea

Abstract: This paper discusses different patterns of innovation and their institutional roots in Taiwan and South Korea. By using USPTO patent data as indicators of innovation, this paper finds that while individuals and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) still account for a significant proportion of the patents in Taiwan, the large conglomerates are the major contributors of patents in South Korea. Moreover, although electronics is the sector that has gained most of the patents in both countries, Taiwan's patent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many patents of Korea are owned by chaebols. It is the view that the SMEs of Korea have yet to gain technological capabilities that enable then to perform on par with Taiwan (Wang & Tsai, ). Many SMEs produce and supply to chaebols, and they are cautious of the risk of offending chaebols by operating beyond the latter's knowledge scope.…”
Section: Process Of Transition Toward Inclusive Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many patents of Korea are owned by chaebols. It is the view that the SMEs of Korea have yet to gain technological capabilities that enable then to perform on par with Taiwan (Wang & Tsai, ). Many SMEs produce and supply to chaebols, and they are cautious of the risk of offending chaebols by operating beyond the latter's knowledge scope.…”
Section: Process Of Transition Toward Inclusive Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Industrial policy, as the bastion of developmental state and, therefore, the manifest practice field for high modernists, is subjected to an intense gaze from the state. It was in this context that the Industrial Technology Research Institute 工業技術研究院 (ITRI) was established in 1973 to facilitate a 'coordinated and state-led developmental network' (Wang and Tsai 2009). According to Chen (2012), 'advanced technology' is the key goal of ITRI engineers, even if this means that the products from their projects might lack market attractiveness.…”
Section: Perennial Power Shortage and The Obsession With Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, for South Korea, not only have its branded chaebols gained international outreach but also the country has become a strong player in a few sectors characterised by closed product architecture and complex system (Choung and Hwang 2007). Even in the semiconductor industry, in which both countries have surged, institutional roots and technological regime can still account for their different paths, as evident in their US patents (Park and Lee 2006;Wang and Tsai 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well-documented, from the perspective of economic development, latecomers' catch-up has much to do with their developmental strategy of export orientation versus import substitution, incorporating into the global production/innovation network, via learning and absorbing an external source of knowledge and accumulating and generating indigenous technological capabilities (Chen 2002;Amsden and Chu 2003;Ernst 2006). In the field of technology management, technological catch-up has become a focal issue and has been discussed in conjunction with several other factors, such as technological regimes (Lee and Lim 2001;Park and Lee 2006;Wang and Tsai 2010), the development of the equipment or capital goods industry (Mu and Lee 2005;Choung and Hwang 2007;Kim and Lee 2008), and indigenous industrial standards (Choung et al 2011;Choung and Hameed 2012;Gao 2014). Of interest to note is a sharp contrast between South Korea and Taiwan in their path and way of catch-up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation