2021
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-147857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National Hemophilia Foundation Enlists Diverse Patient Voices to Inform a National Research Blueprint for Inherited Bleeding Disorders

Abstract: Background: The inherited bleeding disorder (IBD) community has witnessed significant advances in care, yet important gaps persist, particularly in rare disorders and underserved populations. An initiative spearheaded by the National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF) and shaped by the patient community aims to accelerate progress through a national research blueprint. The blueprint is being designed to identify and guide research priorities toward those areas that most significantly impact the lives of individuals a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Facilitators offered explanations to empower RPG members’ understanding of the content and confidence in responding to it. Participants shared real‐time perspectives and comments to which the SOSRS panels were invited to respond (see also below) 30 . Facilitator reports summarising RPG discussions, particularly whether the research priorities presented resonated with participants, whether any important priorities had been omitted, what their hopes for Summit outcomes were, and how NHF can engage the SME community to continue to advance the research priorities, were shared with WG co‐chairs and informed blueprint component manuscripts (currently in preparation).…”
Section: State Of the Science Research Summitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facilitators offered explanations to empower RPG members’ understanding of the content and confidence in responding to it. Participants shared real‐time perspectives and comments to which the SOSRS panels were invited to respond (see also below) 30 . Facilitator reports summarising RPG discussions, particularly whether the research priorities presented resonated with participants, whether any important priorities had been omitted, what their hopes for Summit outcomes were, and how NHF can engage the SME community to continue to advance the research priorities, were shared with WG co‐chairs and informed blueprint component manuscripts (currently in preparation).…”
Section: State Of the Science Research Summitmentioning
confidence: 99%