2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.06.789
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National Heart Foundation of Australia & Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes 2016

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
285
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(289 citation statements)
references
References 210 publications
4
285
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within improved protocols for chest pain assessment and diagnosis, early coronary angiography for high-risk chest pain is increasingly emphasised [97]. Rates of emergent coronary angiography in reported cases of P-SCAD have significantly increased across the documented time periods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within improved protocols for chest pain assessment and diagnosis, early coronary angiography for high-risk chest pain is increasingly emphasised [97]. Rates of emergent coronary angiography in reported cases of P-SCAD have significantly increased across the documented time periods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nearly all of the patients with an initial HsTnI <5 ng/L and a discharge diagnosis of AMI were calculated to be 'high risk' for ACS based on the NHFA/CSANZ 2016 guidelines for risk stratification. 16 Based on existing national recommendations all patients who meet the NHFA/CSANZ high risk classification criteria should be referred for inpatient cardiology investigation and therefore would not have been appropriate candidates for discharge directly home from the ED. 6 The discharge summary diagnosis for the three patients with AMI that were intermediate risk were sepsis, hypertension and atrial fibrillation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the included guidelines, with COI and the average AGREE II scores. Five guidelines were from European continent, 1,12-15 two from the United Kingdom, 16,17 six from the United States, [18][19][20][21][22][23] one from Canada, 24 one from Australia and New Zealand, 25 two from Japan, 26,27 and one from Taiwan. 28…”
Section: Selected Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%