2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National digital soil map of organic matter in topsoil and its associated uncertainty in 1980's China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In soil sciences, ML algorithms are usually trained using the traditional train-validation split or cross-validation (Keskin et al, 2019;Liang et al, 2019), or even no validation (Feng et al, 2019), except for some studies based on DL or with an engineering background (e.g. Reale et al, 2018), including some of our publications on the use of DL for DSM (Padarian et al, 2019c) or soil spectroscopy (Padarian et al, 2019b, a), which use a train-validation-test split.…”
Section: New Good Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In soil sciences, ML algorithms are usually trained using the traditional train-validation split or cross-validation (Keskin et al, 2019;Liang et al, 2019), or even no validation (Feng et al, 2019), except for some studies based on DL or with an engineering background (e.g. Reale et al, 2018), including some of our publications on the use of DL for DSM (Padarian et al, 2019c) or soil spectroscopy (Padarian et al, 2019b, a), which use a train-validation-test split.…”
Section: New Good Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The training dataset is used to learn the parameters, the validation dataset to compare models fitted with different hyper-parameters in order to find the optimal combination, and the test dataset as the independent, unseen data. In soil sciences, ML algorithms are usually trained using the traditional train/validation split or cross-validation (Keskin et al, 2019;Liang et al, 2019), or even no validation (Feng et al, 2019), except for some studies based on DL or with engineering background (e.g. Reale et al (2018)), including some of our publications on the use of DL for DSM (Padarian et al, 2019c) or soil spectroscopy (Padarian et al, 2019b, a), which use a train/validation/test split.…”
Section: New Good Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of importance in assessing the uncertainty is almost as great as that in making a prediction map [58], uncertainty map helped researchers to identify the source of the uncertainty and propose solutions [59,60]. To obtain a very reliable prediction, we can control the uncertainty of soil TN map from two aspects.…”
Section: Uncertainty In Soil Tn Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%