National Differences in Capital Budgeting Systems: A Comparison between Indonesian and Australian Firms

Abstract

Manuscript type: Research paper. Research aims: This study examines the impact of cross-cultural differences on capital budgeting systems. Design/ Methodology/ Approach: Drawing on the contingency theory, 67 non-financial firms listed in Indonesia and Australia were analysed on a comprehensive range of capital budgeting systems. Research findings: The findings support our predictions that relative to Australian firms, the Indonesian firms were found to emphasise more on sophisticated capital budgeting systems (e.g. real options). The results seem to be driven by Indonesia's higher level of perceived environmental uncertainty coupled with Sharia governance rules that aim to mitigate risky transactions. This study also provides evidence to show that the emphasis on sophisticated capital budgeting systems was driven by firm size and finance managers' level of education attainment. Theoretical contributions/ Originality: Prior research has documented an incomplete picture of the link between national culture and capital budgeting systems. This is attributed to the lack of the development of contextual foundations for looking at cross-cultural differences followed by the narrow range of capital budgeting systems being considered in research. Practitioner/ Policy implications: The findings of this study reflect the capital budgeting practices of Indonesia and Australia. The

Capital Investment Appraisal Practices in the Emerging Market Economy of Sri Lanka

“…The results of the analysis highlighted that companies in Sri Lanka tend to choose advanced rather than sophisticated capital budgeting techniques. While some scholars (Liu et al, 2015;Graham & Sathye, 2018) assert that managers in emerging countries have started to use sophisticated capital budgeting practices since they were more exposed to higher levels of environmental uncertainty, this phenomenon was found to be different in Sri Lanka. A comparison of the findings of this study was also made with previous studies conducted in developed countries such as the UK, the Netherlands, Germany and France (Graham & Harvey, 2001;Brounen et al, 2004).…”

“…Therefore, even though capital budgeting theory is applicable to all countries, to a certain extent, the actual practices of capital budgeting vary (e.g., Graham & Harvey, 2001, Hermes et al, 2007. Some scholars (Liu, Wu, Li, & Li, 2015;Graham & Sathye, 2018) have noted that since managers in the emerging country or developing economy would typically experience higher levels of environmental uncertainty, they were thus, more inclined towards using sophisticated capital budgeting practices. It was also highlighted that the use of sophisticated capital budgeting practices in Indonesia suited the country's context (Graham & Sathye, 2018).…”

“…Some scholars (Liu, Wu, Li, & Li, 2015;Graham & Sathye, 2018) have noted that since managers in the emerging country or developing economy would typically experience higher levels of environmental uncertainty, they were thus, more inclined towards using sophisticated capital budgeting practices. It was also highlighted that the use of sophisticated capital budgeting practices in Indonesia suited the country's context (Graham & Sathye, 2018). For instance, formal approaches were found to be useful in mitigating risks throughout the project management.…”

SMEs, Sustainability, and Capital Budgeting

“…These techniques provide a measurable, quantitative framework to capital budgeting decisions, helping to increase accountability and promote efficiency (Sureka et al, 2022). While there are numerous capital budgeting techniques that firms use in practice, variables such as company size, the financial literacy of top management, and a firm's leverage affect the particular method that a company may choose to employ (P. Graham & Sathye, 2018).…”

The Impact of Capital Budgeting Practices on Financial Performance of Lebanese Banks

“…Companies that have more room to expand are better able to do things like diversify their product offerings, take advantage of research and development possibilities, grow via mergers and acquisitions, and update and refresh their physical infrastructure. (Graham & Sathye, 2018) also argues that a company's expansion has a beneficial effect on its financial results. Companies with minimal growth potential have better financial results than those with average growth opportunities.…”