National census of UK endoscopy services in 2019

Abstract

IntroductionThe 2017 Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal (GI) Endoscopy (JAG) census highlighted the pressure endoscopy services were under in meeting national targets and the factors behind this. In 2019, JAG conducted a further national census of endoscopy services to understand trends in activity, workforce and waiting time targets.MethodsIn April 2019, the census was sent to all eligible JAG-registered services. Collated data were analysed through various statistical methods. A further comparative dataset was created using available submissions from the 2017 census matched to services in the current census.ResultsThere was a 68% response rate (322/471). There has been a 12%–15% increase in activity across all GI procedures with largest increases in bowel cancer screening. Fewer services are meeting waiting time targets compared with 2017, with endoscopist, nursing and physical capacity cited as the main reasons. Services are striving to improve capacity: 80% of services have an agreed business plan to meet capacity and the number using insourcing has increased from 13% to 20%. The workforce has increased, with endoscopist numbers increasing by 15%, nurses and allied health professionals by 14% and clerical staff by 30%.ConclusionsThe 2019 JAG census is the most recent and extensive survey of UK endoscopy services. There is a clear trend of increasing activity with fewer services able to meet national waiting time targets than 2 years ago. Services have increased their workforce and improved planning to stem the tide but there remains a continued pressure to deliver high quality, safe endoscopy. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, JAG recognises that these pressures will be severely exacerbated and waiting time targets for accreditation will need adjustment and tolerance during the evolution and recovery from the pandemic.

Endoscopy's Current Carbon Footprint

“…A census of UK endoscopy units reported a total of 2.1 million endoscopy procedures performed in 2019. [9] Over the last two decades, renewed commitments to reduce preventable deaths from colorectal and esophagogastric cancers have led to a surge in screening endoscopies amongst the asymptomatic population. Colorectal cancer screening in the US will soon be expanded to also include those between 45-49.…”

Developing patient-orientated Barrett’s oesophagus services: the role of dedicated services

“…Streamlining is key, given the increasing demand on all aspects of endoscopy, which influences scheduling. 53 Cost implications of BO surveillance Accurate use of the BSG guidelines implemented in 2014 has been shown to reduce the number of unnecessary surveillance procedures. At St Georges NHS trust, Hewett et al reviewed the BO population on their surveillance waiting lists, stratified them according to BO length according to the BSG guideline, and reviewed histology to check the presence of IM.…”

Unsedated Transnasal Endoscopy: A Safe, Well-Tolerated and Accurate Alternative to Standard Diagnostic Peroral Endoscopy

“…Use of unsedated transnasal endoscopy (uTNE) has grown since its first description in 1994 [1], with the number of procedures performed in Japan in particular gaining traction in recent years [2]. However, conventional (peroral) esophagogastroduodenoscopy (cEGD) remains the predominant diagnostic tool in most centers worldwide, including the United Kingdom (UK), as demonstrated in recently published data obtained from the National Endoscopy Database [3]. uTNE is performed using ultrathin endoscopes (6 mm diameter or less) via the nasal route.…”