2018
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National cancer database analysis of outcomes in pediatric glioblastoma

Abstract: Glioblastoma in children is an aggressive disease with no defined standard therapy. We evaluated hospital‐based demographic and survival patterns obtained through the National Cancer Database to better characterize children with glioblastoma. Our study identified 1173 patients from 0 to 19 years of age between 1998 and 2011. Comparisons were made among demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, and survival variables. Fifty‐four percent of patients were over 10 years of age. Approximately 80% of patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(70 reference statements)
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Co-deletion was defined as having both chromosomal arm deletions as reported in the Collaborative Stage Site-Specific Factors by NCDB, cases negative for both chromosome deletions were defined as negative, and patients with only one deletion reported were considered incomplete. Treatment received was assessed as first course of treatment at any CoC facility, as previously described by our group[ 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Co-deletion was defined as having both chromosomal arm deletions as reported in the Collaborative Stage Site-Specific Factors by NCDB, cases negative for both chromosome deletions were defined as negative, and patients with only one deletion reported were considered incomplete. Treatment received was assessed as first course of treatment at any CoC facility, as previously described by our group[ 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age groups cutoff were determined based on historical reports[ 10 , 11 ] and increased mortality cutoffs using area under the curve. Survival and risk of mortality was assessed as previously described by our group using Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazards models[ 18 ]. The level of statistical significance was set at 0.05 for all tests conducted, and all analyses were performed with SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Statistical Institute, Cary, North Carolina).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although differences in survival by race and ethnicity are described in pediatric populations with cancers other than brain and CNS cancer and among adults with brain and CNS cancer, differences are less well described for pediatric brain and CNS cancer . Past reports of pediatric brain and CNS cancer and race and ethnicity have documented differences in survival by race and ethnicity for specific histology types or in specific US states . National reports of pediatric brain and CNS cancer have documented worse outcomes among black patients compared to white patients, but have used <28% population coverage and older data, and some did not assess Hispanic ethnicity .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] Brain and central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the most common type of pediatric cancer in the United States after leukemia, and have the highest mortality rates among all cancers affecting children. [5][6][7][8][9][10] While the incidence and mortality of pediatric brain and CNS tumors remain high, previous research has identified significant differences across racial and ethnic groups in both diagnosis and treatment in this population. 6,11,12 Several studies have identified a significantly higher incidence of brain and CNS tumors in non-Hispanic White children relative to those in racial/ethnic minorites.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,11,12 Several studies have identified a significantly higher incidence of brain and CNS tumors in non-Hispanic White children relative to those in racial/ethnic minorites. [7][8][9]13 While scientific breakthroughs in cancer treatment have improved cancer survival, leading to a one-third decrease in overall pediatric cancer mortality from 1990 to 2016, these advances have not benefited all racial/ethnic groups equally. 1,14 Specifically, despite the observed improvement in overall survival for pediatric cancers, disparities are evident in access to and use of guideline-recommended treatment and outcomes across racial/ethnic groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%