2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National and regional modeling of distinct RSV seasonality thresholds for antigen and PCR testing in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A limitation of an analysis that compares seasonality across countries might be the discrepancies in surveillance systems as previously described, 22 with factors such as case definitions and the surveillance setting potentially having implications on the estimation of RSV seasonality. 32 Another limitation of our study is the lack of representation of several regions of the world as no data from countries in North Africa or the Middle East were included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation of an analysis that compares seasonality across countries might be the discrepancies in surveillance systems as previously described, 22 with factors such as case definitions and the surveillance setting potentially having implications on the estimation of RSV seasonality. 32 Another limitation of our study is the lack of representation of several regions of the world as no data from countries in North Africa or the Middle East were included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our model may be underestimating RSV mortality in recent years owing to changes in case ascertainment. 46 Use of multipathogen PCR panels increases the RSV testing pool to include individuals unlikely to have RSV, thus decreasing the weekly percentage of positive test results. 19,46 Our sensitivity analysis showed that there was little difference in mean estimates over the 20-year period.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46 Use of multipathogen PCR panels increases the RSV testing pool to include individuals unlikely to have RSV, thus decreasing the weekly percentage of positive test results. 19,46 Our sensitivity analysis showed that there was little difference in mean estimates over the 20-year period. Although we do not have data by test type for influenza, increased use of PCR testing has likely affected influenza surveillance.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both MarketScan and NREVSS also showed variation in positivity across regions. Furthermore, both databases had higher antigen positivity (NREVSS 16.0%, MarketScan 21.2%) compared to PCR positivity (NREVSS 7.9%, MarketScan 3.1%), an expected finding that has prompted the CDC to introduce different positivity thresholds to define RSV season onset (10% for antigen tests and 3% for PCR tests) [ 16 , 19 ]. Of note, these differences in positivity across test types are largely attributable to differences in the population for who the tests are ordered and not the sensitivity of the test (e.g., PCR may be ordered after a negative RSV antigen test [ 17 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, NREVSS is a voluntary, passive system, which may not provide a representative sample of RSV tests nationwide. Finally, the four available types of RSV tests, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), viral culture, immunofluorescence, and rapid antigen vary in sensitivity and specificity, availability, turnover time, and cost [16][17][18][19][20]. This can result in different choices of test types across clinical settings and patient populations, influencing overall RSV positivity and thus, incidence estimates.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%