Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.18777/ieashc-task51-2018-0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National and International Comparison of Case Studies on Solar Energy in Urban Planning

Abstract: Targets and goals 3.5 SWEDEN Targets and goals when planning for solar energy in the Swedish cities of Lund and Malmö 54 3.6 SWITZERLAND Comparative performance assessment of parametrically generated variants a master plan of the case studies in Yverdon-les Bains and Lausanne 64 4 Collaborative cross countries case studies 71 Scale and Planning process 4.1 GERMANY-AUSTRIA Challenges for solar energy integration in new urban disctrict developments: Comparative case of Aspern+ Die Seestadt Wiens, Austria and Mun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper presents part of the findings related to Italian case studies within the Subtask C-Case Studies and Action Research (STC) framed in the International Energy Agency (IEA) Solar Heating and Cooling Program (SHC) Task 51 "Solar Energy in Urban Planning" [29][30][31]. During the whole duration (2013-2017), the international experts working in Task 51 (i.e., architects, urban planners, public authorities, researchers, etc.)…”
Section: Framework and Aim Of The Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper presents part of the findings related to Italian case studies within the Subtask C-Case Studies and Action Research (STC) framed in the International Energy Agency (IEA) Solar Heating and Cooling Program (SHC) Task 51 "Solar Energy in Urban Planning" [29][30][31]. During the whole duration (2013-2017), the international experts working in Task 51 (i.e., architects, urban planners, public authorities, researchers, etc.)…”
Section: Framework and Aim Of The Workmentioning
confidence: 99%