2019
DOI: 10.1080/14608944.2019.1590808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National and European identity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analyses confirm that European identity does not necessarily translate to identification with the European Union as an institutional actor or protector of rights (see Castiglione, 2009; Cmeciu and Manolache, 2018; Pryke, 2020). The importance of the European Union featured indirectly in the narratives and concentrated on freedom of mobility and the importance of relating to familiar others in a borderless Europe (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Our analyses confirm that European identity does not necessarily translate to identification with the European Union as an institutional actor or protector of rights (see Castiglione, 2009; Cmeciu and Manolache, 2018; Pryke, 2020). The importance of the European Union featured indirectly in the narratives and concentrated on freedom of mobility and the importance of relating to familiar others in a borderless Europe (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Polish only), compared to 2% who saw themselves as ‘European only’, with an additional 8% choosing the option ‘European and (nationality)’ (meaning European first but also national) and 55% ‘(nationality) and European’ (2% answered ‘don’t know’ or refused to answer the question; Eurobarometer, 2019: 46). Some authors see those and similar results as indicating high levels of European identifications: after all, in total, 65% of the 2019 Eurobarometer respondents saw themselves as European to some extent (Pryke, 2020; Wellings and Power, 2015). Others, however, interpret the results as indicating the weakness of European identity, noting that only a small minority of people strongly identify as Europeans (Pichler, 2008) and that for many others, European identity is shallow (Polyakova and Fligstein, 2016), lite (Risse, 2010) or fragile (Castells, 2018).…”
Section: European Identifications: Queer Europeans In Troubling Timesmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Long-term analyses of European identity from 1973 to 1992 (Anderson & Kaltenhaler, 1996) and 1992 to 2012 (Luhmann, 2017(Luhmann, : 1379 found an enduring (and positive) synergy between European and national identities. In the same period, Laura Cram's research outlined the phenomenon she called 'Banal Europeanism' (Cram, 2009) and Sam Pryke later called 'Europeanism' -as opposed to a 'European nationalism' (Pryke, 2020). These analyses reprised the older neo-functionalist expectation that a new European identity would emerge as citizens of member states realised that their political efforts were best directed at the emergent European level of governance.…”
Section: European Disintegrationmentioning
confidence: 99%