National agendas in global times: curriculum reforms in Australia and the USA since the 1980s

Abstract

This paper provides a comparative analysis of national curriculum reforms in Australia and the USA, set against the backdrop of global trends since the 1980s. The analysis is driven by an interest in the reconstitution of national policy spaces in global times, and draws particularly upon Stephen Carney's notion of global policy-scapes as a way of understanding the complex and disjunctive flows of transnational policy ideas and practices. The paper begins by arguing that reforms since the early 1980s have been driven by global panics about globalisation, equity and market competitiveness. These global influences have underpinned parallel reform attempts in each country, including the development of national goals in the late 1980s, failed attempts at national standards in the early 1990s and rejuvenated attempts towards national consistency in the 2000s. Building on this, we argue that despite shared global drivers and broad historical similarities, reforms in each country remain distinct in scope and form, due to several unique features that inform the national policy space of each country. These distinctive national policy spaces provide different conditions of possibility for reform, reminding us that despite global commonalities, policy reforms are relational and locally negotiated.

Associations between school absence and academic achievement: Do socioeconomics matter?

“…It is unclear why these differences emerge. It is possible that differences in the student populations (Western Australia vs. Massachusetts), measures used, or any number of other cultural, political or demographic differences between Australia and the United States (Savage & O'Connor, ) contribute to the divergent findings. Goodman () argues that students attending poor schools may have greater difficulty catching up on missed work, which is certainly supported by the current and previous studies showing differences by student‐level characteristics (e.g.…”

Theorising teacher performance dispositions in an age of audit

“…The aim of such a focus is enhanced economic competitiveness and accountability, driven by a ‘globalized educational policy discourse’ of high‐stakes testing, considered the only way to ‘enhance the quality of a nation's human capital’ (Lingard et al ., , p. 540). Economic competition feeds into this pressure for global education comparisons involving standardised testing programmes ‘…fuelled primarily by an assumption that young people's test scores reflect their future capacities to compete in global markets’ (Savage & O'Connor, , p. 610).…”

Introduction – National curriculum: international perspectives

“…321-2). The USA doesn't have formal provision for national curriculum, not yet at least, although it might be said that the recent move towards 'Common Core State Standards' presages a push in this direction (Savage and O'Connor 2015). Apropos the USA, it is worth recalling here Michael Apple's assertion, well over two decades ago now, that "we already have a national curriculum, but this is determined by the complicated nexus of state textbook adoption policies and the market in test publishing" (Apple 1993, p. 2).…”