Nation-State Science: Lappology and Sweden's Ethnoracial Purity

Abstract

This paper introduces the concept of “nation-state science” to describe the scientific work of ethnoracial classification that made possible the ideal of the homogenous nation-state. Swedish scientists implicitly defined their nation for Continental Europeans when they explicitly created knowledge about the “Lapps” (today's Sámi/Saami). Nation was coupled to state through such ethnoracial categories, the content of which were redefined as Sweden's geopolitical power rose and fell. These shifts sparked methodological innovations to redefine the Lapp, making it a durable category whose content was plastic enough to survive paradigm shifts in political and scientific thought. Idiosyncratic Swedish concerns thus became universalized through the scientific diffusion of empirical knowledge about Lapps and generalizable anthropometric techniques to distinguish among populations. What Sweden lost during the nineteenth century in terms of geopolitical power, it gained in terms of biopower: the knowledge and control of internal populations made possible by its widely adopted anthropometric innovations. Nation-state science helps unpack the interrelationships between state-building, nation-making, and scientific labor.

Meeting at the Philosopher’s Stone: The Encounter of Enlightenment and Indigenous Religion in Maupertuis‘ Expedition to Lapland (1736–1737)

“…Despite the popular cliché, nomadic reindeer herding was only one, though the most acknowledged, form of subsistence, but by no means the most original (Pentikäinen 1997, 79). 14 Rather, it was the result of an encounter: "[T]he iconic feature of Lappishness-nomadic reindeer pastoralismwas the product of contact with the Swedish state" (Mattson 2014; see also Salmi et al 2018). Administratively, the state, however, was not able to establish and guarantee stability in matters of the Sámi.…”

Towards an Economic Sociology of Race

“…Sociologists, historians, and philosophers have documented the historical formation of race as a category of thought and a collection of practices of domination in the 17 th and 18 th centuries. 9 As Mattson (2014) shows, one of the earliest racial typologies, produced by Frenchman François Bernier in 1684, identified four major races: Europeans, Africans, Asians, and Lapps. These typologies shifted over the next three and a half centuries -most Americans would recognize the first three racial categories, but not the last.…”

Fugitives, Vagrants, and Found Dead Bodies: Identifying the Individual in Tsarist Russia

“…Their goals were different, though, in that they sought to identify classes of people, and most importantly to distinguish Swedes from Sami in an effort to define their nation racially (and also, as it happens, to contrast proper Swedes with their enemy the Russians). 85 These other practices show a crucial difference in the intent of the Russian system of identification. Russian authorities were not interested in creating racial or ethnic or moral categories out of these records (though one can imagine how they might have been used to do so).…”