2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61406-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nasolacrimal Polyurethane Stent Placement for Epiphora: Technical Long-term Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…After this time, there was a progressive increase in the number of non-functioning stents up to 13% patency after 4 years. Our data disagree with those reported in the literature, showing a higher rate of stent occlusion [30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After this time, there was a progressive increase in the number of non-functioning stents up to 13% patency after 4 years. Our data disagree with those reported in the literature, showing a higher rate of stent occlusion [30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Dopo tale periodo, nella nostra casistica, si assiste ad un progressivo aumento degli stent non funzionanti fino ad arrivare al 13% di pervietà dopo 4 anni. I nostri dati si discostano da quelli della letteratura, evidenziando una maggiore incidenza di occlusione [30][31][32][33][34]. Il dacriocistostenting, secondo la nostra esperienza, mostra una percentuale di occlusione molto elevata a lungo termine e non può pertanto essere proposto come alternativa all'intervento chirurgico.…”
Section: Discussione E Conclusioniunclassified
“…In persistent cLDO, high-pressure nasolacrimal duct probing with subsequent silicone-tube intubation is recommended, while in aLDO, external or endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and endoscopic dacryoplasty of the nasolacrimal duct system are widely used. The restenosis rate is about 5-25% in aLDO [9][10][11] and 10-15% in cLDO. 10,12,13 The persistence of the bacterial inflammation resulting from an ineffective postoperative treatment may be one major reason for operative failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing the results of all existing studies the conclusion met in the present study could almost be expected, however failed to be proven so far. The longer the follow-up period (6 months, 1 year, 2 years) [8,9,11,12,13,21,28,29] the lower was the success rate or the rate of patent stents. The early postoperative [2] to early medium-term [3] results of our patients (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors found similar or worse results. Pabon et al [12] reported a stent patency of 72% in a follow-up period of 1 year, and Schaudig and Maas [21] found a success rate of 50% for the same period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%