2007
DOI: 10.1097/sap.0b013e31802f104b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nasolacrimal Duct Reconstruction With Nasal Mucoperiosteal Flap

Abstract: Surgical repair of lacrimal drainage apparatus may be quite difficult in patients with maxillofacial injuries involving extensive structural damage. When the primary tear tract has become nonamendable or inaccessible, it would then be necessary to set up an alternate draining route for tear passage. Conjunctivorhinostomy with a Jones tube is an effective diversionary treatment method, and yet this procedure might be plagued with problems related to alloplastic device usage. Autologous tissue is therefore best … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies chose Jones tube or extradural tube as the support in the new tube after surgeries. [2][3][4] However, disadvantages relating to internal support were observed. In spite of the high rate of functional success in the early postoperative stage, these methods were noted to be associated with low rate of patient satisfaction and a number of complications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies chose Jones tube or extradural tube as the support in the new tube after surgeries. [2][3][4] However, disadvantages relating to internal support were observed. In spite of the high rate of functional success in the early postoperative stage, these methods were noted to be associated with low rate of patient satisfaction and a number of complications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%