Nascent island tourism policy development in Greenland: A network perspective

Abstract

Following its achievement of Self-Rule status in 2009 Greenland embarked on a series of measures to diversify its economy with an eye towards eventually gaining full independence from Denmark. Tourism was underlined as a key sector for reaching this goal and, consequently, over the last few years there has been a concerted effort to develop the island as an important polar destination. Significantly, the Greenlandic government created the tourism development policy for 2016-2020, which it views as a key instrument for shaping the sector's future. In this paper, we adopted a policy network approach to determine the relational architecture among various stakeholders from the public and private sectors who are seen as relevant to tourism's development. Inter alia, we examined how these actors were linked to each other while examining what kind of tourism networks existed in Greenland and what obstacles might hinder or foster their formation. A thematic analysis of qualitative data on Atlas.ti reveals that though there exist networks in the Greenlandic tourism sector, they are not policy networks and that the Greenlandic government's approach to developing this tourism policy has been top-down, reflecting a 'government' rather than a 'governance' approach. Barriers to the formation of policy networks included lack of a shared image for the future; lack of trust among actors; lack of time and spatial fragmentation hindering iterative interactions, and lack of institutional enabling of information and knowledge sharing.

‘Made in Airbnb’: Sense of Localness in Neolocalism: Tourism Dynamics on Heimaey, Iceland

“…Over the last two decades, tourism researchers have paid growing attention to cold water islands (Baldacchino, 2006;Petridou et al, 2019;Prince, 2017;Röslmaier & Albarrán, 2022). This research focus on high latitude destinations, many of which are located in polar and sub-polar regions, coincides with their enhanced association with alternative tourism forms, which attract more adventurous individuals compared to those lured by the sand, sea, and sun in lower latitudes (Butler, 2006).…”

City Government Capacity and Patterns in Urban Development Project Governance

“…236–37) noted of “the economics of jurisdiction,” “it is scarcely surprising that local governments are both jealous to protect what jurisdictional levers they already enjoy and are eager to enlarge their repertoire of constitutional instruments.” This strategy of jurisdictional capacity maximization is attractive regardless of how much power a local government has at present, but the way in which the strategy is pursued is strongly dependent on the existing government infrastructure. In environments in which other governance actors are weak, a government may be able to get away with largely ignoring them when exercising governance (e.g., Petridou, Olausson, and Ioannides 2019), but engagement in deep cross-sector collaboration may be desirable even for a government with strong jurisdictional capacity (e.g., McBride 2019).…”

Tourism Network in Urban Agglomerated Destinations: Implications for Sustainable Tourism Destination Development through a Critical Literature Review

“…Tourism destination network research accentuates destination policy rather than urban policy. It provides policy support for destination development by analyzing the significance of network creation among destination residents, DMOs, and companies [78,79].…”