2000
DOI: 10.1097/00006565-200002000-00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nasal wash technique for nasal foreign body removal

Abstract: Nasal foreign bodies are seen commonly both in the office and pediatric emergency department setting. There have been a number of strategies described for their removal. We describe the "nasal wash" as a technique for nasal foreign body removal in the following three case reports. The "nasal wash" has been used in many pediatric vaccine studies as a method to collect mucus and relies on simple equipment readily available in the office setting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Good for: Friable foreign body Note: Potential reflux of saline and/or nasal contents into the eustachian tubes and potential aspiration of the foreign body [5]. However, no known adverse event has been reported by investigators who have regularly performed this technique to obtain nasal specimens for research studies [5].…”
Section: Saline Washout Technique [15]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Good for: Friable foreign body Note: Potential reflux of saline and/or nasal contents into the eustachian tubes and potential aspiration of the foreign body [5]. However, no known adverse event has been reported by investigators who have regularly performed this technique to obtain nasal specimens for research studies [5].…”
Section: Saline Washout Technique [15]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no known adverse event has been reported by investigators who have regularly performed this technique to obtain nasal specimens for research studies [5].…”
Section: Saline Washout Technique [15]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lichenstein et al 15 described 3 patients in whom the nasal wash technique was used successfully. They recommend filling a bulb syringe with approximately 7 milliliters of sterile normal saline and placing it in the contralateral nostril.…”
Section: Nasal Washmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no complications in any of the patients. 15 This method has many disadvantages. Forcibly irrigating saline through the nose is uncomfortable and carries a significant risk of aspiration.…”
Section: Nasal Washmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removal by non‐invasive methods avoids the need for an invasive approach involving instrumentation, which is distressing for both child and parent, and has a significant risk of complication (mucosal laceration, pain, epistaxis, aspiration) 1,2 . Other attempts at non‐invasive techniques have so far been largely unsuccessful 1,3 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%