2014
DOI: 10.9790/0853-13197172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nasal Smear Eosinophil CountVs AEC of Patients diagnosed with Allergic Rhinitis Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital &the Effect of Treatment with a TopicalSteroid Nasal Spray on theSame

Abstract: Allergic rhinitis being a heterogeneous disorderis often under-diagnosed despite its high prevalence.The age, sex, race or socioeconomic status has no bearing on those who get affected.It is one of the most common chronic conditions in the developed world with a significant impact on the quality of life.Methodology: All the patients who were diagnosed with allergic rhinitis satisfying the inclusion criteria were included in the study by universal sampling, after obtaining informed consent. A total of 42 patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Among 60 children, running nose was the most common symptom accounting for 90% of cases followed by nasal obstruction (83.3%). Similar results were seen in the study by Shetty SS et al and Kumar N et al 8,10 Nasal eosinophil and blood eosinophil count was done in all 60 cases and nasal eosinophil count of >10 cells/hpf is consider positive as per IAP recommendation. Many studies have taken different cut off values.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…7 Among 60 children, running nose was the most common symptom accounting for 90% of cases followed by nasal obstruction (83.3%). Similar results were seen in the study by Shetty SS et al and Kumar N et al 8,10 Nasal eosinophil and blood eosinophil count was done in all 60 cases and nasal eosinophil count of >10 cells/hpf is consider positive as per IAP recommendation. Many studies have taken different cut off values.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%