2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nasal screening is useful in excluding methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in ventilator-associated pneumonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
19
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, there were too few individual endotracheal tube aspirate, sputum, and BAL samples to analyze. However, studies including respiratory samples 15,17,18 have reported sensitivity and specificity similar to those found in the current study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, there were too few individual endotracheal tube aspirate, sputum, and BAL samples to analyze. However, studies including respiratory samples 15,17,18 have reported sensitivity and specificity similar to those found in the current study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Reported values for sensitivity and specificity of MRSA nasal-swab screening alone for predicting MRSA infection have ranged from 50.0% to 88.0% and from 83.0% to 100.0%, respectively. [15][16][17][18][19][20] The comparability of these results is limited by the different nasal- swab assays used at each site. Many studies used polymerase chain reaction, which has been shown to increase sensitivity 22 relative to the chromogenic medium used at the current study site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the use of MRSA screening tests to guide antibiotic therapy remains poorly studied. Prior studies have evaluated their use in multiple situations, including intra-abdominal (10), postoperative (11), respiratory (12,13), and overall documented clinical infections (14). There is little published on the use of MRSA screening in bloodstream infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%