2002
DOI: 10.1067/mlc.2002.121661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nasal lavage as a tool for the assessment of upper-airway inflammation in adults and children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous articles reported nasal lavage cell distribution in healthy controls (Nikasinovic-Fournier et al 2002;Prat et al 1993;Kinhult et al 2003), but to the best of our knowledge neither has the speciWc cell distribution previously been described in such a large number of subjects, nor has a cut-oV to objectively deWne nasal eosinophilic inXammation been proposed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous articles reported nasal lavage cell distribution in healthy controls (Nikasinovic-Fournier et al 2002;Prat et al 1993;Kinhult et al 2003), but to the best of our knowledge neither has the speciWc cell distribution previously been described in such a large number of subjects, nor has a cut-oV to objectively deWne nasal eosinophilic inXammation been proposed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Another concern may regard the reproducibility of nasal eosinophils (Howarth et al 2005;Castano et al 2008;Nikasinovic-Fournier et al 2002). In our study the eosinophil intra-subject reproducibility, evaluated in AR patients in whom a minimal persistent inXammation exists (Bousquet et al 2008), was good.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Nasal inflammation was assessed by using a noninvasive, well-tolerated, and reproducible method. 24 All nasal biomarkers, apart from eosinophils, did not differ between asthmatic and healthy children. One possible explanation is that all children living in urban areas could present with increased NALF mediators, whatever their health status.…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nasal response was evaluated by using an NAL method adapted from the Hilding procedure for children. 24 NAL consisted of irrigation of the nasal cavity (3 instillation/aspiration cycles for each nostril) with saline solution (NaCl 9%) through a transparent inflated pediatric Foley catheter (Porgès SA, Le Plessis Robinson, France). The NALFs recovered from each nostril were pooled and centrifuged (500g) for 15 minutes at 14°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different parameters that can influence the results of the nasal lavage. Studies have shown that time of day, duration of solution in the vestibule, temperature of the solution, performing pre-washing or not, number of repeated measures each day and days in a row may all influence the results gained [173,[180][181]. The concentration, volume and presence of various markers may be altered due to these factors and consequently they are significant to consider when performing a study.…”
Section: Nasal Lavagementioning
confidence: 99%