2009
DOI: 10.1080/10717540902764172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nasal administration of metoclopramide from different dosage forms: in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…sCT also has a relatively short residence time in the nose, which limits its absorption. The lack of a suitable mucoadhesive polymer in commercial formulations is another possible reason for low bioavailability of sCT via the nasal route (Tas et al, 2009). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sCT also has a relatively short residence time in the nose, which limits its absorption. The lack of a suitable mucoadhesive polymer in commercial formulations is another possible reason for low bioavailability of sCT via the nasal route (Tas et al, 2009). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tas y colaboradores, evaluaron la permeabilidad de la metoclopramida contenida en diferentes formulaciones (solución, gel y polvo) y encontraron que el polímero y la conformación del mismo, tienen un efecto sobre el porcentaje de liberación del fármaco, es decir un alto contenido de polímero, conformado en micelas va a dar Vargas-Fresneda lugar a un sistema muy intrincado que dificulta la difusión del fármaco, porque reduce el área de difusión molecular efectiva, lo cual permite afirmar que una formulación de partículas puede ser superior en desempeño a los sistemas de gel o hidrogel. (Tas et al, 2009) Fig. 5.…”
Section: Ensayo De Liberación In Vitrounclassified
“…The mucosa must be oriented with the mucosal side facing the donor chamber. The thickness of the tissue (usually 200 µm) should be measured and mentioned as it is directly linked to the diffusion rate (Tas et al, 2009;Shah et al, 2015;Acharya et al, 2013). The influence of the thickness was investigated in a study that compared the permeation of both hydrophilic (i.e.…”
Section: Ex-vivo Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%